And that's that: Parliament prorogues

[Herewith, the last few minutes of the 1st session of the 40th Parliament of Canada]

The Speaker: The honourable, the Minister of Justice is rising on a point of order.

Hon. Rob Nicholson (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada): Mr. Speaker, it is my duty to inform the House that Her Excellency the Governor General of Canada has just issued the following proclamations under the Great Seal of Canada:

Elizabeth THE SECOND, by the Grace of God of the United Kingdom, Canada and Her other Realms and Territories QUEEN, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.

To our Beloved and Faithful Senators of Canada, and the Members elected to serve in the House of Commons of Canada, and to all to whom these Presents may in any way concern,

GREETING:

A PROCLAMATION

Whereas we have thought fit, by and with the advice of our Prime Minister of Canada, to prorogue the present Parliament of Canada;

Now you know that, We do for that end publish this Our Royal Proclamation and do hereby prorogue the said Parliament to Monday the twenty-sixth day of January, 2009.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, We have caused this Our Proclamation to be published and the Great Seal of Canada to be hereunto affixed.

WITNESS:

Our Right Trusty and Well-beloved Michaëlle Jean, Chancellor and Principal Companion of our Order of Canada, Chancellor and Commander of our Order of Military Merit, Chancellor and Commander of Our Order of Merit of the Police Forces, Governor General and Commander-in-Chief of Canada.

AT OUR GOVERNMENT HOUSE, in our City of Ottawa, this fourth day of December in the year of Our Lord two thousand and eight and in the fifty-seventh year of Our Reign.

GREETING:

A PROCLAMATION

Now know that We, being desirous and resolved as soon as may be to meet Our People of Canada, and to have their advice in Parliament, do hereby, by and with the advice of Our Prime Minister of Canada, summon and call together the House of Commons of Canada to meet at Our City of Ottawa, on Monday, the twenty-sixth day of January, 2009, then and there to have conference and treaty with the Senate of Canada.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, We have caused this Our Proclamation to be published and the Great Seal of Canada to be hereunto affixed.

The Speaker: [My translation from the French] Order please! Given the statement made by the Minister of Justice, I now vacate the Chair.

[And here endeth the First Session of the 40th Parliament]

(Ainsi se termine la première session de la 40e législature.)

PM meets the premiers

Next January 16, Canada's prime minister, whomever that might be, will host a meeting of the country's premiers and territorial leaders. This is a followup meeting to the one that Prime Minister Stephen Harper held last month in Ottawa.

Harper issued the following invitation this afternoon but it remains to be seen if he himself will be able to attend the meeting:

OTTAWA – On November 10, 2008, the Prime Minister met with Canada’s Provincial Premiers and Territorial Leaders to discuss ways that Canada’s different orders of government can cooperate in responding to the current global economic crisis.

Building on the productive discussions of that meeting, Prime Minister Harper issued an invitation today to Canada’s Provincial Premiers and Territorial Leaders for a follow-up First Ministers’ Meeting, to be held on January 16, 2009. This day-long meeting will be accompanied by a session with Aboriginal Leaders on economic development opportunities for Aboriginal Canadians.

A critical objective of this meeting will be to identify issues related to accelerating infrastructure investments, strengthening financial market regulation, improving competitiveness and ensuring labour market preparedness and flexibility where immediate government actions will make positive economic impacts.

This First Ministers’ Meeting will build on the concrete work and recommendations of responsible Ministers in the meantime. To this end, the Federal-Provincial-Territorial Finance Ministers will meet on December 16 and 17, 2008 in Saskatoon. The federal Infrastructure Minister John Baird will work with all provinces and territories to identify and to accelerate, before the First Ministers’ Meeting, specific projects in each jurisdiction that would contribute to stimulating the economy in the next two construction seasons. Diane Finley, Minister of Human Resources and Skills Development, will work with her provincial and territorial counterparts to remove barriers to labour mobility, enhance skills development and foreign credential recognition.

Together, these meetings will stimulate productive discussions on economic issues of importance to Canadians and ensure that all governments continue to work together to prepare Canada’s economy for a strong future.

Coalition talk: In their own words

Like a lot of reporters, I spent a lot of time hanging around the foyer of the House of Commons Friday talking to politicians from all sides about the possibility of Stephen Harper losing the keys to 24 Sussex over his ecnomic and fiscal statement. At the end of a long day of political gossip, the prime minister himself came down to the foyer, made a short statement but, unlike just about every other politician that came into the foyer that day, refused to answer any questions from the 40 or so reporters gathered about. Here are some excerpts from some of the things we heard in the foyer Friday from those who would speak on the record. We have, below, Liberals John McCallum and Scott Brison, NDPers Paul Dewar and Tom Mulcair, and finally, the prime minister:

John McCallum (Lib): The primary issue is that while other countries have acted in the tens of even hundreds of billions of dollars to support their economy, the fiscal update did nothing. In fact, it's worse than nothing. It didn't have stimulus, it had cuts. Canada's virtually unique in the world. We have a crisis, probably worse than anything since the 1930's and Canada stands alone and they're doing nothing to support Canadians, to support the economy, to support industries in trouble, to support Canadians' savings and pensions.

Scott Brison (Lib): Even worse, during the good times, the Conservatives spent like crazy, increasing spending by 25% and now during a recession, they're actually cutting back. So it is really bad financial management.

Reporter: So if f they took out the subsidies for political parties, you would still entertain the possibility of bringing them down?

Brison: Well look, that would show that Stephen Harper still doesn't get it. He would still be playing politics. This is not about politics, it's about people and until Stephen Harper presents a proposal to Parliament that helps people during these tough economic times, we won't support him.

McCallum: Maybe Stephen Harper still doesn't get it. The ball is still in his court. We have spoken about fiscal stimulus over and over again as the number one concern. When Canada alone is doing nothing, maybe he thinks all we care about is political financing. I'm telling you that is not our primary point. Our primary point is the absence of any kind of action or plan to help Canadians at this moment.

Reporter: What magnitude of fiscal stimulus would you require to support the government?

McCallum: The government will probably say just wait for the fiscal stimulus. I don't believe the government. If they believed in fiscal stimulus, they would have done it yesterday. They've been in power three years. Obama's been in power not even at all, he already has a plan. If this government believes in fiscal stimulus, they would have acted yesterday. They tell us they'll act some time in the future. Why should we believe that?The problem with Mr. Harper, the problem with Stephen Harper is he talks like Franklin, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, he acts like Calvin Coolidge. That is not acceptable in 2008.

Reporter: Who have you been talking to with the NDP? Do you have a coalition?

Brison: We're a long ways from prenup agreements. The fact is right now Mr. Harper has successfully in some ways, changed the channel in this debate from one of economics and people to one of politics. We're turning it back. We're focusing on the people. And until he presents a proposal that actually invests in Canadians during this recession, we won't support it.

Reporter: You're saying to Canadians essentially you would move more quickly than the Conservatives if you defeated this government?

McCallum: I am telling you it would be a whole lot bigger and a whole lot quicker than anything this government may or may not do because I don't even believe them when they say that they would do it. Look: Mr. Harper in Peru [last week at the the APEC summit] said that it was essential to have an extraordinary fiscal stimulus. He had the opportunity yesterday. What did he do? Nothing. So why should we believe him when he says he's going to do it at some unspecified date in the future?

Brison: Mr. Harper promised during the election to present an economic plan to Canadians almost immediately after the election. This fall, he said there will be an economic plan presented to Canadians this fall. He broke that promise. Once again, there has been no plan, no ideas and no investment at a time when he's out of step with all other industrial leaders across the planet.

—————-

Reporter: My question is what is going on between you and the other parties?

Gilles Duceppe: (Bloc Quebecois): We're having discussions. We discussed things with the Liberals this morning. We'll discuss with the NDP this afternoon. We had meetings. I discussed with Jack Layton yesterday and Stéphane Dion. But we're having those discussions looking at if we can come to an agreement but we'll take the time we need.

Reporter: What would be the goal of the Bloc Québécois in supporting any kind of coalition?

Duceppe: We said that we won't be part of a coalition and [we won't be] having ministers from the Bloc; this is very clear. But we'll consider a coalition that would respect more Quebec values and interests. So this is why we're having those discussions because we just can't accept the proposals made by the government yesterday.

Reporter: What about the Liberal leader? Have you insisted on this leader or that leader?

Duceppe: No, no, no. This is not — this is not up to us to decide who's the leader of any party.

Reporter: So if Dion leads that's fine with you.

Duceppe: I mean Dion is there. He's the leader. I'm discussing with the leaders of each party.

Reporter: And what are your priorities, sir? What do you need to support a coalition?

Duceppe: To have [them] come with stimuli concerning the economy. To have a real plan for manufacturing and forestry sector. To have a better conditions for the employment insurance and so on.

—————

Reporter: Where's the mood of cooperation.

Paul Dewar (NDP): Exactly. It's gone. The blue sweater's gone, the whole thing's gone out the window and these guys are using the recession as a Trojan horse to bring in retrograde labour legislation. No one's going to buy it. We're going to be opposing.

Reporter: Is the only way out of this do you think forming some kind of coalition with the Liberals come next week and defeat the government?

Dewar: It's really a multi-party strategy here. We know what we're going to be doing, opposing this kind of retrograde legislation. I think from what I've seen from the other parties they're going to do the same.

Reporter: And then what?

Dewar: We'll see. There's all sorts of options open and I guess that's what Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday will bring.

Reporter: Coalition or election?

Dewar: I think people saw that we had an election so maybe the other option is the best one.

Reporter: Who would lead that?

Dewar: I think all the options are open and what we've said is we'll work together to get results in this parliament. That's what Canadians expect from us. That's what I want to see. That's what I think Canadians want to see and the calls I got from my office this morning from my constituents they said pull together, make sure that you have everyone working together and that's what we're going to be doing. So clearly the government doesn't want to work together. So the other options are in front of us and we'll be deciding what the best path is for Canadians.

Thomas Mulcair (NDP): Well I think that there's no doubt that the Conservatives are going to try a lot of different things over the weekend. What has to be borne in mind is that what we've been looking at here in the House over the past couple of days is a boldfaced attempt by the government to change the channel to get you onto question of minor reductions here and there while obviating the fact that the real problem is that there's nothing for the economy. Three hundred and fifty thousand manufacturing and forestry jobs lost because of the wrong headed principles of the Conservatives. They're attacking women's rights to equal pay for work of equal value. They're attacking the charter rights of associations. That's the type of thing that we're going against. There's nothing in there for Canadian families. Christmas is coming and Minister Flaherty's put a lump of coal in their sock.

And finally, at the end of a long day in the foyer — there was Prime Minister Stephen Harper. Here is the English part of his statement — no questions were allowed.

Stephen Harper (Con): Less than two months ago, the people of Canada gave our party a strengthened mandate to lead Canada during the most serious global economic crisis in generations. Since that time, we've acted, acted on our commitment to keep cutting job-killing taxes, business taxes, acted to expedite the constructions of roads, bridges and other infrastructure, acted to strengthen Canada's already strong financial system by injecting tens of billions of dollars of liquidity into Canada's credit markets, acted to ensure a long-term structural balance in the federal budget, and acted to demonstrate leadership by proposing to reduce taxpayer subsidies for political parties. Our actions have been proactive. They have been responsible. And they have been in keeping with our commitments to Canadians.
More so, these actions represent our first steps. In the next couple of months, the government will present a budget that outlines our next move forward, a plan that will include expected stimulus measures worked out in consultation with Canada's provinces and in concert with the other members of the G-20.
While we have been working on the economy, the opposition has been working on a backroom deal to overturn the results of the last election without seeking the consent of voters. They want to take power, not earn it. They want to install a government led by a party that received its lowest vote share since Confederation. They want to install a prime minister, Prime Minister Dion, who was rejected by the voters just six weeks ago. They want to install a coalition that they explicitly promised not to support. The Liberals campaigned against the coalition with the NDP precisely because they said the NDP's policies were bad for the economy. And now they plan to enter into the very same coalition under the guise of strengthening the economy. Stéphane Dion and the NDP plan to make this happen by accepting the support of a party that wants to destroy the country.
The opposition has every right to defeat the government but Stéphane Dion does not have the right to take power without an election. Canada's government should be decided by Canadians, not backroom deals. It should be your choice, not theirs. And it's now up to all of us to stand up for the right of Canadians to choose their own government.
On December the 8th, the House of Commons will have an opportunity to vote on the opposition's attempt to overturn the results of the last election. Until then, we will continue governing. In the meantime, Canadians can make their views known on this issue to all of their members of parliament.
Thank you very much and I hope you will all have a good weekend.

Meanwhile: The inevitable Facebook Groups

Ok you Facebookers — send 'em in and I'll post 'em here:

  • I'm against the Liberal coup d'état : Description: The Liberals are trying to steal the government after losing the election. Canadians didn't vote for a Liberal or NDP or Bloc government. If they are going to defeat the Tories, Canadians must have their say on who forms the next government. Not backroom Liberal and NDP insiders. Creator: Mark Bullard: Creator
  • Canadians for a Progressive Coalition: Description: Canadians for a Progressive Coalition are asking the NDP, Liberals, and Bloc Quebecois to form a coalition government that includes counsel from the Greens. Creator: Jamie Biggar (Former Toronto Centre Conservative candidate Mark Warner is a member of this group.)
  • I Support Public Campaign Financing: Description: The Conservatives are cutting the funding from which they benefit least in relative terms, while leaving alone that which they benefit from most. They are making one more attempt to disable democracy in this country. Creator: Devin Johnston
  • Dear Santa: All I want for Christmas is a Liberal-NDP Coalition : Description: Santa, this year, instead of some overpriced consumer items my parents can't afford, or another long $300 million election, all I want for Christmas is a Liberal-NDP Coalition Government. Then maybe we can have a happy new year! Creator: Michael Creighton
  • For a coalition government in Canada/Quebec to save the climate and economy Description: We call on the NDP, Liberal Party and Bloc Quebecois to form a coalition government. The majority of voters in the 2008 federal election clearly want action on those issues and reject the Conservative Party. The three opposition parties can come together with a program to fight global warming and deal with the economic crisis. We call on them to do this. Creator: Arleigh Crawford

Technorati Tags: , ,

Get me the GG!

Governor General Michaëlle Jean is out of the country right now on a state visit to some eastern European countries. Today, she's in Slovakia visiting a church and an art gallery and tomorrow she is in the Czech Republic where she has a series of events scheduled Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday. On Thursday, it's off to Slovenia until next Saturday when she returns home.

Of course, Mme Jean may be required back at Rideau Hall much sooner than that.

Here's what her staff are telling reporters today:

The Office of the Secretary to the Governor General is following the situation closely.

Her Excellency is very aware of her constitutional responsibilities. Contingency plans are in place for her to return to Canada should this be required.

The Governor General is being briefed on a regular basis while continuing her heavy programme for the State visit. This visit is creating important links with these four member countries of the European Union.

Monday's motions from the Liberals

In addition to the confidence votes that will be prompted when the government tables a bill and a motion of its own on Monday, the Liberals get to table and vote on their own motion Monday for Monday is one of the alloted “Opposition Days” in Parliament. In every parliamentary session, the government is obliged to set aside a certain number of days for the introduction, debate, and vote of a motion put forward by an opposition party.

Under the House of Commons procedural rules, the opposition party must publish the motion they intend to introduce one business day ahead of their opposition day. They can, if they choose, give notice of several different motions and then decide only to actually debate and vote on one.

So what are the Liberals thinking about for Monday? Pick one from the list below:

Mr. Dion–THAT, in light of the Conservatives’ failure to recognize the seriousness of Canada’s economic situation, and its failure in particular to present any credible plan to stimulate the Canadian economy and to help workers and businesses in hard-pressed sectors such as manufacturing, the automotive industry and forestry, this House has lost confidence in this government, and is of the opinion that a viable alternative government can be formed within the present House of Commons.

Mr. Kennedy–THAT this House call upon the government to table in Parliament before December 12th, 2008 a comprehensive analysis of Canada’s troubled automotive sector; a calculation of the most likely impact upon Canada and Canadian jobs of American action to support the U.S. auto sector without corresponding action in Canada; and the principles which should shape such Canadian action.

Mr. McCallum–THAT, in the opinion of this House, the government should revise its most recent Economic and Fiscal Statement to reflect the views of the now-Prime Minister who said in this House on October 6th, 2004: “It is the government’s obligation to craft a working majority to advance its agenda by taking into account the policies and priorities expressed by the three opposition parties in the House” and “the first thing the government must do is actively find common ground with the opposition parties to better serve the Canadian population.”

Mr. Brison–THAT the House call upon the government to provide Parliament with a specific list of all assets under review for disposal, as referenced in the government’s Economic and Fiscal Statement, together with an explanation of the criteria that has lead the government to conclude that such assets are expendable, with particular emphasis on the assets reportedly worth at least $2.3 billion above book value which are to be disposed of first, in the coming fiscal year.

Liberals hold emergency caucus

In the wake of the widely leaked news that Finance Minister Jim Flaherty will propose doing away with the public subsidy of political parties, the federal Liberal caucus held an emergency meeting this morning in the Centre Block on the Hill. They're just breaking up now but there are suggestions that some are broaching the idea that it might be a good idea to send out feelers along the lines of a coalition government. In the 12-month period ending Sept. 30, the public subsidy — $1.95 per vote received in the last general election per year — made up about two-thirds of the revenue of both the Liberals and the BQ. For the NDP and Greens it was about half and for the Tories it was 35 per cent.

Here's Liberal Party spokesman Daniel Lauzon:

“We feel the current political financing laws exist to provide stable annual funding to political parties based on the level of support they earn. As such, they are crucial to a healthy democratic process.Though it’s not surprising that the day this government is plunging Canada into multibillion dollar deficit, the Conservatives are trying to change the channel, it’s indefensible that rather than introducing significant measures to address the economic crisis, Stephen Harper has instead chosen to use today’s Economic and Fiscal update to take a cheap partisan shot at his political opponents.”

Flaherty will tell all beginning at 4 pm Ottawa time in the House of Commons.

Deficits and the historical record

Here are some excerpts from then finance minister Paul Martin's budget speech on Feb. 24, 1998:

Paul Martin - 1998

What I am about to say is something no Canadian government has been able to say for almost 50 years.

We will balance the budget next year.

We will balance the budget the year after that.

And, Mr. Speaker, we will balance the budget this year.

Mr. Speaker, it is clear that a new era lies ahead. And because of that, we owe it to Canadians to repeat what our principles will be as we go forward.

First, we will stay the course that brought us here. We will be frugal. The battle to root out waste and inefficiency can never end.

Never again will we allow the spectre of overspending to haunt this land.

Never again will we let old habits return — of defining bigger government as better government, of believing that every problem requires another program.

And never again will we see Canadians undergo round after round of painful cuts in order to dig us out of yet another hole.

Canadians have paid to see the movie ‘The Deficit'. They don't want to pay to see the sequel.

Today, in Lima, Peru, Prime Minister Stephen Harper told the world that the sequel is comin' to town next spring:

Stephen Harper - Lima … We did agree at the G20 last week that additional fiscal stimuls should be used to sustain global demand if monetary policy continues to prove to be inadequate.

These are, of course, the classic circumstances under which budgetary deficts are essential.

I say this with some reluctance, in fact, some great reluctance.

We in Canada have had bad experience with deficits.

Federally, 27 straight deficits threatened the very stability of our economy. We worked long and hard to get out of it and to educate the public as to why it was bad.

In my own case, I began my political career, about 20 years ago now, in a fledgling new political party, in part to campaign for the necessity of fixing that structural deficit.

So whatever short-term fiscal stimulus or deficit spending our government pursues, we will ensure that Canada does not return to long-term, structural budgetary deficits.

There are, many experts will tell you, good reasons for the government to return to deficits. One of those experts is Harper himself, who holds a masters degree in economics and, as he said in his speech today, was pursuing a career as a university economist studying economic history and macroeconomic theory when the pursuit of that career was interrupted by his current one:

The world is entering an economic period unlike, and potentially as dangerous as, anything we have faced since 1929. … Let us remember what led to the Great Depression.

It was not caused by a stock market crash. That was only the beginning. Policymakers pursued four sets of actions that defined that terrible decade.

They allowed a rapid contraction of the banking system.

They allowed widespread deflation as a consequence.

They undertook to balance the books at all costs — raising taxes and contracting government economic activity at the one time when fiscal stimulus was absolutely essential.

And, finally, they erected protectionist barriers in a short-sighted attempt to preserve jobs.

These are mistakes the government of Canada will not make.