If you add up the circulation of all the major metro tabloids (Toronto, Montreal, Quebec City, Ottawa, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg), all the daily broadsheets (London, Kingston, Peterborough, etc.) and all the weeklies that Quebecor owns, the stuff I write for my mainstream media organization, Sun Media/QMI Agency, you end up with a number larger than 6 million. And that's just circulation. Readership will always be a bigger number than circulation as people tend to pass the paper they get around to others in their household so now we're talking a potential readership of, I'd guess, at least 7 million.
I have, at last count, a blog readership of about 90,000 a month, just under 4,000 Twitter followers, about 1,100 Facebook friends, and 38 Google Buzz followers. And I've just jumped on Tumblr. (Feel free to follow me there). I've toyed with StumbleUpon, Reddit, and other social media sites but, while they might be for you, they aren't for me. (Former colleague Kirk LaPointe is big on FourSquare but I haven't yet started fiddling seriously there.)
So a potential readership measured in the millions on that old mainstream media and a readership measured (if I'm really lucky) in the thousands and yet, I seem to spend an inordinate amount of time creating content or monitoring content for that tiny social media audience rather than spend my time working exclusively for that mainstream media audience. I was challenged, at the Canadian Association of Journalists conference in Montreal this spring, by some about the time I was spending/wasting on social media. Why not use that time to make one more phone call? To track down another source? Fair points. (Complicated answer to those questions poorly summed up by saying: It's not either/or and print reporters tend to over-interview and over-research if you ask me …) And yet, as I mentioned, I've just decided to carve yet more “wasted” time out of my day to try out Tumblr. Why?
I ought to answer that question in a more fulsome way but, in the meantime, some quick notes about how I'm using my social media toolbox as both a newsgatherer and a news reporter:
- First principles, Part 1: My work for Sun Media (and before that, Canwest, and before that, CTV, and before that, The Globe and Mail, National Post, etc.) pays the mortgage. Everything I'm doing on my blog, Twitter, Facebook, etc. is done with an eye towards helping me be better at the work that pays the bills.
- First principles, Part 2: A lot of people use social media to connect with family, friends, etc. Not me. I'm all business. I'm not using these tools to post pictures of the kids or what I did on my summer vacation. Part of my rationale for this is a concern for the privacy of my family but mostly it's because I believe people I have never met are not much interested in my personal life but there's a good chance they might be interested in some of the things I see and learn in my professional life. Social media, just like my mainstream media work, lets me tell people about the things I see and learn in my professional life.
- The Blog: I've been blogging since 2002 and I'd keep blogging even if no one was reading it. Blogging, for me, is like a giant, searcheable notepad. It's a place to dump notes and other bits that I might need again later in my reporting. It's also a space to talk about some of the 'craft' issues, like this, and that, I think, helps develop credibility and trust with readers/viewers which supports First Principle 1. Plus, this blog is what passes, I suppose, for long-form social media. NYU prof/media critic Jay Rosen and I had an exchange back in 2005 about why I blog. My answers, five years later, still feel about right.
- Twitter : Chief downside to Twitter – 140 characters and that's it. Chief upside to Twitter – 140 characters and that's it. Twitter, for me, is the all-news channel of my social media universe. As a publisher/content creator, I use it to try to be “first with the news” in much the same way that I did when I was with CTV's Parliamentary Bureau. But if I had some news while at CTV, I'd have to phone up the News Channel assignment desk, tell them what I have, arrange to get an anchor in the chair, write up an anchor intro, get a camera guy to light me up in the Ottawa studio, hook up the audio gear, open up a line to the Toronto studio and then, likely after the next commercial break, I'd get on TV with the “breaking news”. That could take 20 minutes or more. On Twitter, I (and many other print journalists on Parliament Hill) are out and running with whatever news is happening immediately and, by the time the news networks get to it, it's old. (And here's some perspective by the way: If you added up the Twitter audience of me, the Star's Susan Delacourt, and CBC's Kady O'Malley, you have about 12,000 people. The average audience for the all-news channels of CBC and CTV can drop as low as 15,000 and rarely gets much above 50,000 at any point during a regular news day.) Being first with breaking news supports the goal of First Principle 1.
- Facebook: The blog, Twitter, and Google's Buzz are great tools because search engines index them and that means I can use them to find stuff I wrote ages ago and so can anyone else. Facebook I find less useful because I can't find stuff as easily. And yet, there's no denying, that Facebook is very popular and there's an audience of sorts out there. Except for photographs, I rarely post new or original content first at Facebook. Instead, I use Facebook mostly as a distribution platform to point my friends to the new or original content in my newspapers, on my blog, or on Twitter and Buzz.
- Google Buzz: My use of Google Buzz is mostly as an extension of my use of Google Reader, my preferred RSS client. Like most reporters, I tend to read a lot of stuff and, back in the old days, you'd physically cut out with scissors the interesting bits you wanted to keep for later and then put it in a physical file folder. Now, I just highlight and add it to Google Buzz. Easier than scissors and searcheable! I've set up by Buzz account so that stuff I clip and post to my Buzz account will get sent to my Twitter feed. So, like Facebook, I'm not creating new or original content here but if you're interested in seeing what I find interesting when I'm reading, then that's what my Buzz account is for.
- Tumblr: So now we come to Tumblr. How am I going to use this service to support First Principle 1? Remember: New and original content I create goes to the newspapers; some goes to the blog; lots of tidbits go to Twitter; and pics end up on Facebook. The blog, Twitter, Facebook, and Google Buzz are also excellent distribution platforms to drive traffic back to the real important stuff I'm doing for Sun Media. Where will Tumblr fit in that ecosystem? As a newsgatherer, I'll use Tumblr to follow other Tumblr users that are important to my professional life — politicians, journalists, bureaucrats, etc. As a content creator, I'll probably re-purpose/re-create content I've created first for other platforms. Where I see Tumblr having a unique role (and remember: I've had a Tumblr blog for all of about an hour now) is in follower/user-generated content. Tumblr has a neat “Ask Me Anything” feature and a neat “Submit” feature. I hope my readers/followers jump in and use these features to point me at ideas and events I might not have otherwise thought to get involved with.
good article… trying to follow all the thought processes in it but looks like you continue to champion use of social media
“It's also a space to talk about some of the 'craft' issues, like this, and that, I think, helps develop credibility and trust with readers/viewers which supports”
Part of the reason I enjoy this blog is the way you describe the mechanics of collecting and disseminating news, as opposed to simply pontificating, like some other journalist blogs who seem to seeing blogging as another platform for their columns.
Those news channel numbers are eye-opening. Does the 15,000/50,000 refer to each channel or is that combined ? And why is it so difficult to find this information in Canada unless you subscribe ?
The actual audience for social media is likely even smaller. If you have 4,000 Twitter followers, only a fraction will likely read every tweet, so probably not a fair comparison to newsnet viewership. More important, perhaps, is the connectedness of these people, particularly on the Hill.
That could change, however. The challenge for news organizations is to adapt the speed of social media and maintain ownership of the content its reporters create. That is, they have to find a way to make Twitter pay the bills. It costs money to keep reporters on staff. If they are going to cover news with Twitter, there needs to be a revenue model — and, no, an ad in a Coveritlive window on the company website isn't it.
You forgot your AudioBoo feed, which I think a great supplement to your Twitter feed.
Good points, Glen. And underscores, perhaps, those who think it's a waste of time talking to a handful of Twitterers when you could spend that extra time working on something for the legacy platforms and millions of readers!
Great points and really interesting to hear how all of these tools relate back to your first principles.
I'm struck, though, by the continued insistence that being first to report a story is somehow related to first principles part 1 – making you a better journalist.
With the speed with which stories spread, is being first still a feather in the cap to anyone other than other journalists? If someone steals your scoop and reports it as their own, or if a Twitter follower RTs or spreads your news, does the end reader really care who had it first?
I also find that in a 24hr news-on-demand society, being first often (not always) means being, at best, incomplete and, at worst, incorrect.
Would it really be so bad to be second and have a more complete story? Does the pressure to be first ever make you file something (be it on Twitter or in the paper) you regret later because it's wrong or because it's incomplete?
Great post, and also some great comments.
An overall comment about the “Social Media” and “Social Networking” for journos: Think of these like a wonderfully advanced phone system … on steroids if you will … we can gather information, stay in touch with sources/contacts, interact, tell people about that information, etc. using SM and SN. But we should still be posting the bulk of that information on our home sites … the places that pay the bills. SN and SM are very advanced, up-to-the-second communication platforms that enhance and expand all the things we've always done as journalists.
Re. the Joe Bougnner post about being first … at the Ottawa Sun where I am online editor, we're very careful about posting stuff. Being first is important, but not paramount in my personal opinion. Verifying information is most important. Our smell test is “Would we publish this information in the paper?”
Credibility remains a bigger issue online than in “tradtional” media forms, so being right is crucial. It goes to the heart of journalistic morals and ethics.
With that said, being first online with breaking stories is crucially important if you want to be perceived as a key information source with your community. If people hear something is breaking, but only find it on the site of a competitor, where will they go first next time?
Depending on the story, being “complete” is not always a major concern, but you need enough information to make the story valuable to your readers. It's not hard to let folks know there is more info coming, and readers know in breaking situations not all details will immediately be available.
The solution of course is both to be first, and right. But if I had to choose just one, I'll hold something until we know for sure we are right, and have the details needed to make it useful to our readers.
Don Wilcox
Sr. Online Editor, Ottawasun.com