Stephen L. Carter on the Fourth of July: America’s Most Disagreeable Holiday

Americans are celebrating their Independence Day today and in a most excellent essay, Yale law professor Stephen L. Carter sets out the case that democracies — American’s but also Canada’s — must have dissenters to thrive …

…the one symbol of patriotism that has yet to fade is our love of dissent — loud, raucous, passionate, sometimes impolite — and it is dissent that we should be celebrating on Independence Day.

It’s hard sometimes. If you’re like me, at least twice a week you encounter some opinion that makes your blood boil. Maybe it comes from a friend or colleague, maybe from a politician or pundit; whatever the source, a part of you surely wonders how any seemingly intelligent person can possibly believe that drivel, much less express it. The Fourth of July is exactly the right occasion to pause and give thanks for those disagreeable views — and for a country that was founded on our right to express them.

Dissent is central to democracy, and although I believe dissent should be civil, its centrality doesn’t fade when it isn’t. As sociologist Charles P. Flynn pointed out in his 1977 book “Insult and Society,” insults aimed at government officials “provide a check to those in power who may be tempted to think of themselves in grandiose terms, above the rest of humanity and hence not subject to insults.”

via America’s Most Disagreeable Holiday – Bloomberg.

Connecting global Anglo-American primacy and democracy

Kevin Narizny, an assistant professor at Lehigh University in Bethlehem, Pa., has an interesting essay in the latest issue of the journal World Politics. The paper is called “Anglo-American Primacy and the Global Spread of Democracy: An International Genealogy” and, in it, Narizny argues “that Anglo-American primacy over the past three centuries was a necessary, but not sufficient, cause of the global spread of democracy.” Continue reading Connecting global Anglo-American primacy and democracy

Reaction to my "Don't mind us Canucks: We're just here for pipelines and pandas" column

As we arrived in China last week covering Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s visit there, this column of mine was published in our newspaper chain. It concluded:

The Chinese are sensitive about [human rights issues]. They do not like to be called out on their lousy human rights record. The Chinese need not worry. The Canadians this week are here for pipelines and pandas.

After reading that column, someone named Will Wei on my Facebook page accuses me of “hate speech” Continue reading Reaction to my "Don't mind us Canucks: We're just here for pipelines and pandas" column