The War Room War

In the wake of last night's French-language debates — which our pollster says Dion did best at — the war rooms of the major parties have been issuing releases left, right, and centre today. These are some summaries of all of the press releases filling my inbox today. It all seems like terribly wasted effort as all the political news that most assignment editors will want for tonight's newscasts and tomorrow's papers will almost certainly be about the two debates on this evening.

The Liberal war room wants us all to know:
• NDP Leader Jack Layton needs to do something about Durham candidate Andrew McKeever who apparently says, on his MySpace page, that he liked the part in Schindler's List “when the guard starts waxing the prisoners” and goes on to say his hero is George W. Bush.
• Conservative MP Cheryl Gallant needs to retract the “lies” she's been telling consituents in her rural Eastern Ontario riding. The Liberals would like her to know that their plan will not tax the use of firewood.
• They have a new television ad, might even be their best yet, though that's probably not saying much. This one reminds viewers that, in 2003, Stephen Harper delivered a speech that had been plagiarized from a speech of Australian Prime Minister John Howard.
• The Liberals followed that up with a press release detailing all the international press coverage with headlines like “Copycat Canadian leader” or “Harper Speech Scandal“.
Harper has no plan for the economic crisis facing Canadians.
• They've launched an anti-Harper Web site: Harpernomics.ca
• A Vancouver woman got a half-a-million dollar government contract shortly after being acclaimed as a Conservative candidate in a riding that is just about the best thing the Liberals have for a lock in B.C. (It's Ujjal Dosanjh's riding in Vancouver South)
• Conservative MP and former minister Michael Chong likes the idea of a carbon tax, thank you very much.
• The NDP would hike EI benefits.
• If you criticize anything the Conservative government does, even if you are demonstrably non-partisan, you are, by definition, a “Liberal.”

The NDP war room asks:
• Why can't the Tories add? Conservative “Bay Street” math doesn't add up when it comes to the cost of the Afghanistan mission. The Tories say it has or will cost $8-billion but the NDP says other estimates suggest it could cost $22-billion.
• Where is the Conservative election platform? The Conservatives are the only party that has not released their election platform. If I were a betting man, I'd say they do it Monday.
• Why are the Liberals contradicting themselves on unemployment insurance? Liberals are misleading Canadians on funds available to help workers, the NDP says.
• What if Dion calls a meeting of premiers and bigwigs on the economy, as he promised last night that he would do, and they all tell him to ditch the carbon tax? (Funny: Several Tories I had a beer with last night said the same thing.)

The Conservative war room reminds us that:
• Dion is hiding — hiding, I tell you! — from his Green Shift.
• Stéphane Dion “discovers the economy but still has no plan.” This picks up on a theme several Tory advisors were scratching their head about after last night's debate. Dion's plan, they said, is to come up with a plan after he's elected? How do you campaign on a plan to plan, they wondered.
• Some Liberals have said some dumb things about their leader, including MP Charles Hubbard, who apparently wondered today how things might have been if Bob Rae or Michael Ignatieff were in charge.
• Dion is a hypocrite when it comes to the issue of arts funding.
• In announcing a new economic plan (or a plan to plan) in the middle of last night's debate, Dion is reminding us that his predecessor did the same thing in a debate in 2006 — and that really didn't turn out well for him.

The Bloc Quebecois war room lets us know that:
• It, too, has some new TV ads featuring various BQ candidates attacking Harper for his rigid ideology.

And then there's the Green Party:
• Party in New Glasgow Saturday night! BYORB! (Bring Your Own Reuseable Bottle!)

2 thoughts on “The War Room War”

  1. Strikes me that the Liberals are more about bull than they are about the issues that affect Canadians. McKeever is not significant and he apologized and he never had a hope of winning anyway. I DON'T CARE ABOUT THE SPEECH. Really, some dude was short on time and cut and past. Bad but should it decide my vote – no. The only stuff that is relevant to me is the stuff on the economy. I am no fan of Harper. They couldn't even we me over. Then again the tories focused more on candidate gaffes than on issues as well – so they could get me to look again. Three war room offerings all relevant to the issues of the campaign. The more I see the more I know that a vote for the New Democrats and Layton is the right call.

  2. “If you criticize anything the Conservative government does, even if you are demonstrably non-partisan, you are, by definition, a “Liberal.””
    OK, I'd put it differently, not branding them as “Liberal” but definitely as adversaries. Let's take the claim the CMA denounced the government's actions on the listeriosis crisis.
    I posted this comment today at another blog (conservative, natch):
    «I'd like to offer you a tidbit that perhaps went unnoticed. It concerns the listeriosis crisis and the claim that the Canadian Medical Association criticized the government for its handling of it.
    However, this is the article that people point to as proof of the CMA's disapproval:
    http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/rapidpdf/cmaj.081477v2.pdf
    Notice who is the first person listed as one of the writers of that article. Its author is Prof. Amir Attaran, who has been embroiled in various controversies, including the Afghanistan detainees issue. He is definitely an anti-Harper advocate.
    Also notice the disclaimer at the end of the CMAJ webpage: http://www.cmaj.ca
    “All editorial matter in CMAJ represents the opinions of the authors and not necessarily those of the Canadian Medical Association.”
    PM Harper tried to make a similar point during the debate yesterday, but was drowned out by the other leaders»
    And I had previously posted a similar comment on Sept. 19 at another conservative blog;
    «For [commenter] Not_like_u, who provided a link to the Canadian Medical Association’s take on the listeriosis crisis: http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/rapidpdf/cmaj.081477v2.pdf

    I would invite you to look at the end of that document. Its author is Prof. Amir Attaran, who has been embroiled in various controversies, including the Afghanistan detainees issue.

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070209.wdetaineeprofile09/BNStory/specialComment

    The Globe and Mail

    February 9, 2007 at 6:20 AM EDT

    “To say that Amir Attaran is no stranger to controversy is a bit of an understatement.
    He’s taken on the World Health Organization over malaria treatment, environmentalists over banning DDT and even Médecins sans frontières (Doctors Without Borders) over drug patents.
    Now, the 40-year-old University of Ottawa professor is in the middle of another maelstrom, the treatment of detainees in Afghanistan. And, this time, it’s getting more than a bit personal. …”»
    Sometimes it’s wise not only to look at WHAT is said, but also WHO says it.
    I believe that is what the Conservatives have done in this instance. Looking at the source of the criticism is as important as examining the criticism itself.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *