Bank of Canada: Despite what you heard, it's not that bad

The Bank of Canada today released its semi-annual Financial System Review or FSR [PDF} In it, the Bank warned that if times get tough, people will lose their jobs and when people lose their jobs, they'll have a hard time making their mortgage payments. Of course, you probably didn't the Bank of Canada to figure that one out for you but that's what they “warned” today.

Now some news organizations took that warning today and ran with it, blaring headlines that might make one think that a wave of mortgage defaults was not only imminent but unavoidable. In fact, as the bank notes, just one of every 250 mortgages is in arrears in Canada right now (arrears is still a long way from default) and that's much better than the average since 1997.

In fact, the big news, it seems to me, from the Bank was its assessment that by-and-large Canadian households are holding up very nicely, thank you, in this economic storm. Now remember, this is an economic storm that our prime minister two weeks ago said was as dangerous as anything we've seen since 1929. And yet, the Bank says, right there in black-and-white, that, so far as the average Canadian household goes, “the overall situation remains relatively positive.” Now that's news!

The Bank also notes that the national debt-service ratio — the ratio that essentially measures our ability to pay — is near historical lows which means, to use the Bank's phrase, “households can comfortably manage their financial obligations.” Now the Bank doesn't say this directly but I'll be happy to make the leap: Canada's consumers have plenty of room to take on more debt by buying more stuff which would, on its own, help stimulate the economy. Plus we'd all end up with lots of neat new stuff.

In any event, while the Bank worries we're all going to hell in a handbasket — and many journalists took that to mean that we actually are going to hell in a handbasket — it's pretty clear that it is the Bank of Canada's considered opinion that the Canadian consumer is a long, long, way from booking that ride. I've bolded the key phrases that support that view in this passage, taken from pp. 21-22 of the today's FSR:

The June FSR noted that the financial position of the Canadian household sector remained sound. Developments since then suggest some deterioration, but the overall situation remains relatively positive.

Household credit has continued to increase at a strong pace recently (11 per cent year-over-year in September 2008). With the more moderate growth in disposable income, the debt-to-income ratio rose further in the second quarter of 2008 to 137 per cent. Still, household debt remains lower as a share of disposable income than is the case in the United States and the United Kingdom. Reflecting lower effective borrowing rates for households, the debt-service ratio (DSR) has edged lower from 8.0 per cent in the fourth quarter of 2007 to 7.5 per cent in the second quarter of 2008. This is below the historical average of 9.2 per cent, suggesting that, at the aggregate level, households can comfortably manage their financial obligations.

The debt-to-asset ratio rose to 17.8 per cent in the first half of 2008, its highest level since 1991. After increasing strongly over the preceding five years, household real net worth has remained roughly unchanged since the onset of the turmoil in financial markets and has likely declined in the second half of this year, following the sharp drops in global equity markets, together with declining Canadian house prices. In the near term, asset values are unlikely to provide much support to the financial situation of Canadian households.

Indicators of household financial stress also suggest some slight deterioration in the financial position of households in the first half of 2008. After having been stable at historically low levels for the past three and a half years, the proportion of mortgages in arrears rose to 0.26 per cent in the second quarter of 2008 but remains below the average level since 1997 of 0.38 per cent. Personal bankruptcies are also slightly higher than they were in 2007, although they remain well below the peak reached in the late 1990s.

Overall, despite a modest deterioration, the financial position of the Canadian household sector remains relatively positive. On the other hand, rising debt levels mean that more Canadian households are becoming vulnerable to negative economic shocks at a time when the economy is expected to slow, raising the risk that the incidence of financial stress among households may increase. This bears close monitoring, given the deteriorating economic outlook.

3 thoughts on “Bank of Canada: Despite what you heard, it's not that bad”

  1. And now I'm afraid I have to take back part of the laurel I sent your way in a previous thread because of this:
    “Now remember, this is an economic storm that our prime minister two weeks ago said was as dangerous as anything we've seen since 1929.”
    As you yourself have suggested, the reporting about the economic situation in Canada has been less than accurate.
    But by including that sentence about the PM, you have in effect included him in that group of overly alarmist observers.
    However, in reading this report of what he actually said in Peru, I get a completely different picture.
    Here's part of that report:
    http://www.nowpublic.com/world/prime-minister-harper-compares-economic-crisis-1929
    «LIMA, Peru – Prime Minister Stephen Harper said the current economic crisis could be as dangerous as the financial collapse that began in 1929 and the world must avoid repeating history by recognizing the Great Depression was caused by bad government policies. …»
    Please notice he said “could be” NOT “is.” “Could be” if governments implement the same policies that were implemented back in '29 and subsequent years.
    To make sure the same thing that happened in '29 does NOT happen again, PM Harper said:
    «”We reiterate our firm belief that free market principles, and open trade and investment regimes, will continue to drive global growth, employment and poverty reduction,” the statement says.
    “There is a risk that slower world growth could lead to calls for protectionist measures which would only exacerbate the current economic situation.”»
    In other words, if free market principles, open trade and investment regimes are allowed to function, with the proper regulatory oversight, then the world will NOT face a situation similar to the Depression.
    Alarmist? No.
    Sounding a warning against protectionist tendencies as being harmful? Yes.
    Realistic, IMO.

  2. Actually, Gabby, I was there, in Peru, sitting in the balcony of the auditorium while the prime minister gave that speech. And I was there at the press conference he held in Lima. I'm pretty sure I'm correctly characterizing the prime ministers words and intentions at the APEC summit in Peru.
    But thanks for the laurel, no matter how briefly I have may have held it …

  3. I guess I have to defer to you, since you were there and I wasn't.
    But I still maintain he was not being alarmist. Perhaps it's because I firmly believe the PM speaks my language. I firmly believe I understand what he says without having to parse every single word, whereas you guys are always trying to decipher “what does he really mean by that?” or “what signal is he trying to send?”
    Or maybe it was just the altitude? 😉
    Average altitude in the Large Lima: 133 metres above sea level
    Ottawa Elevation: 80 M (262 FT)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *