Khan does the Liberals a favour

Liberal Leader Stephane Dion issued a statement and that’s all the press he’s doing today on the Wajid Khan defection. But a Liberal staffer e-mails me to make a point that you’d think Dion might have wanted to make, that being, that Khan is doing the Libs a favour by vacating a Toronto-area seat.

How’s that, you ask?

“He's done the party a huge favour by opening up a Toronto seat for a high profile candidate. We were having problems finding a spot in the event nobody retired,” my Liberal source says. “Could be Rae, Kennedy, Findley or someone else. Maybe even Rock.”

Mind you, Bob Rae might run against Jack Layton in Broadview-Greenwood; the thinking there being that, for Rae, it wouldn’t be the worst thing in the world for him personally to lose and, just by running he would suck NDP resources into that riding to support Layton.  Gerard Kennedy is probably eyeing Parkdale-High Park, now held by NDPer Peggy Nash who unseated Liberal Sam Bulte in the last election. But Martha Hall Findley might make sense there.

Both Liberal and Conservative staffers I spoke to today, by the way, agree that Khan doesn’t have a hope winning the riding as a Conservative.

Despite a very credible Conservative candidate in 2006, the Liberal Khan coasted to victory by 7,000 votes.

 

Liberals on Khan's defection

Stephane DionLiberal Leader Stephane Dion (right) just issued this statement:

It is with regret that I have received word of Mr. Khan's decision to leave the Liberal Caucus and join the Conservative Party.

As a member of the Liberal Party of Canada, I was never comfortable with Mr. Khan serving as an advisor to a Conservative Prime Minister, as Mr. Khan has done since August of last year.

As Leader of the Party, I felt it imperative that he decide to which party he would ultimately be loyal. Mr. Khan has now made that decision.

A new Liberal front bench

Liberal leader Stephane Dion held his first caucus meeting this morning and, shortly after, we received the new seating plan for the House of Commons with the revamped front bench. We understand that Dion has not yet decided on new “Critics” — Opposition critics earn an extra several thousand dollars a year for their responsibilities — but may do that later in the week. Here’s what it will look like in Question Period today. We understand that all those whom Dion bested will get a chance to fire at the Tories.

Joe Mcguire

 

Gary Lunn

Diane Marleau

 

Loyola Hearn

Lawrence Macaulay

 

David Emerson

Albina Guarnieri

 

Monte Solberg

Joe Comuzzi

 

Chuck Strahl

Jean Lapierre

 

Tony Clement

Michael Ignatieff

 

Jim Flaherty

Lucienne Robillard

 

Lawrence Cannon

STEPHANE DION

 

STEPHEN HARPER

Ralph Goodale

 

Jim Prentice

Ken Dryden

 

Peter MacKay

Scott Brison

 

Stockwell Day

Carolyn Bennett

 

Vic Toews

Hedy Fry

 

Gordon O’Connor

Maurizio Bevilacqua

 

Greg Thompson

Joe Volpe

 

Carol Skelton

Jim Peterson

 

Bev Oda

Bill Graham

 

James Moore

Paul Martin

 

Jim Abbott

 

Speaker of the House

 

Stephane Dion's Speech

Here is the text of Stephane Dion’s speech to the Liberal leadership convention Friday night (check against delivery):

Thank you.
My friends, we will never forget this weekend in Montreal.
Years from now, we will tell our children, our grandchildren: I was there, in Montreal, when we liberals came together, when we chose our leader, when we chose our path forward into the 21st century.
We feel tonight the burden of responsibility on our shoulders, because, if we tap into our great Liberal tradition of Wilfrid Laurier, if we boldly address the challenges of our time, if we choose the right leader, then we will beat Stephen Harper… and we will provide this great country with a Liberal government that will work for all Canadians.
My friends, for over ten years, I have stood shoulder to shoulder with you, as an MP and Cabinet Minister, fighting election after election. Eleven years ago, Jean Chrétien invited me to join his government to help keep Canada united, to bring clarity about the unity of our country. I stood up for Canada. And I delivered for my Prime Minister, my party and my country.
Two years ago, Paul Martin invited me to stand up for Canada’s environment – the most important challenge of our generation and the next. And I delivered for my Prime Minister, my party and my country.
Today, I humbly stand to serve you once again.
And I pledge that I will deliver– as leader of our great party. And with the help of each and every one of you: as Prime Minister of our great country.

Liberal friends and Canadians watching at home :
Canada has everything it takes to succeed in the 21st Century.
But today… something is wrong. And we all know it.
What is wrong is the direction Stephen Harper and his so-called “New” Conservative Government is taking Canada.
Today we face a very right-wing Government, much more like the current US Republican Party than the old Tories, the former Progressive Conservative Party of Canada.
Canada has a Prime Minister who thinks that the United States is not only our ally, but also our model.
A Prime Minister who would have immersed us in the Iraq nightmare.
A Prime Minister who, last Spring, blackmailed Parliament with the threat of an election, in order to impose on Canada, blindly, two more years in Afghanistan with no clear mandate.
A Prime Minister who is mirroring the style of his hero to the point that President Bush should be getting royalties from Mr. Harper’s speeches.

A Prime Minister who imposes ideological cuts to women, aboriginal people, official language communities, literacy, arts and culture. Culture! There is more culture in a bowl of yogurt than in this Conservative government!
A Prime Minister who – make no mistake — is undermining the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, sending a chilling signal for what he intends to do if he gets a majority government.
We have a Prime Minister who thinks that Child Care is delivered through the mailbox.
A prime minister who is such a control freak that he is muzzling his ministers and using their own staffers to spy on them.
A Prime Minister who tore up our Climate Change Plan, Project Green, which would have allowed us to honour our international Kyoto Commitments. Instead, he’s put forward an inept Clean Air Act, which is nothing more than an excuse not to act, a smokescreen.
A Prime Minister who is virtually pulling us out of Kyoto. Remember that a year ago, here in the Montreal Convention Center, in the name of the name Canada, I presided over a United Nations conference which brought the world together, 182 nations, for a joint action plan against the greatest ecological threat facing humanity: climate change.
And this year, at the same Conference in Nairobi, this Conservative government has shamefully failed the world and tarnished Canada’s international reputation.
What a disgraceful way to govern.
I helped bring the world together to fight Climate Change. Since then, Stephen Harper has wedged the world apart.
Well, my fellow liberals, the world needs Canada. Under my leadership, Canada will not fail the world.
The main problem with these new conservatives is that they have no trust in the role of government in society. They dislike it, they are clearly unhappy. Well, we liberals are compassionate, and for their own sake we will put the conservatives out of their misery – out of the government and back to opposition!
And yet, I am convinced that to beat Harper in the next election, it will not be enough to capitalize on his mistakes. It will not be enough to be a government in waiting.
To win, we must offer our own project to Canadians, a generous and ambitious vision that is in stark contrast to Mr. Harper’s selfish and narrow idea of Canada.
Throughout this leadership race, I have proposed such an ambitious project, one that is so needed. I call it the Three Pillar Approach: weaving together, better than any other country in the world, economic prosperity, social justice and environmental sustainability.
In the 21st Century, the countries that will succeed – that will lead – will have the strongest, most sustainable economies. These countries will be rich because they use energy efficiently. Because they use their precious natural resources wisely. Because they recycle and conserve. Because they will export their solutions to the world, and they will earn megatonnes of money with it. I want Canada to be one of
these leading countries, at the front of the line.

The main issue of the century, the one on which all others depend, is the junction between the economy and the environment. In other words, no less than the reconciliation between the people and the planet.
It is the responsibility of Canada, as well as its self-interest, to tackle this issue.
I say that a country so blessed – with 10% of the world’s fresh water, 7% of the world’s land, and 14% of the world’s energy reserves must be a responsible custodian to the world. As the aboriginal proverb says, “ We do not inherit the planet from our ancestors, we borrow it from our grand children. “
I say that we, as a country of 33 million people, who are consuming as much energy as the entire continent of Africa with 800 million people, our duty is to be part of the solution.
When the former Chief economist of the World Bank warns that humanity may lose, because of climate change, a fifth of its collective wealth over the next decades, I know that we Canadians are listening.
The problem is that we have a Prime Minister who is not listening.
Yes, my fellow Liberals, the world needs Canada. Under my leadership, Canada will not fail the world. But for that, we Liberals must take up our responsibilities this weekend. We need to add to the core of our political philosophy — from the classic two pillars approach, we need to embrace the three pillars approach.
We are the Party that brought the first two pillars together – economic prosperity and social justice. The NDP do not understand the market economy. The Conservatives do not understand social justice. But we Liberals have always championed both. Over the last decade we have learned to deliver both – with strong fiscal discipline. We know that good social policy is good economic policy. People become
healthier, better educated, more secure, better equipped to be strong players in the economy. And then, a stronger economy produces more social justice.
These two pillars are the core of who we are as Liberals. But they alone will not carry us through the 21st century. It is time now to add the third pillar – the pillar of environmental sustainability.
All of my action plans that I have released, week after week throughout this leadership race, are aimed at building the three pillars of this strong Canada and making it attractive and relevant in the daily life of
Canadians.
Imagine the next election, going door to door and asking Canadians : « do you want an extra thousand dollars in your pocket every year? Do you need to change your furnace, your appliances, retrofit your home? Well, through tax rebates, green mortgages, and other incentives, we will help you buy the most energy efficient products – the ones that will save you money every year. It will be good for your wallet,
good for the planet. »
But it takes more than tax breaks. The sustainable economy is, above all, a knowledge economy. We need to invest in the skills and talents of all Canadians, in our colleges and universities, in our students.
We need to better link the lab and the market. We need to get Canadian ideas into the marketplace more quickly.
We need to make sure that our resource based regions, our agricultural sector, our hard working farmers are involved in this sustainable economy. All my proposals for our regions, for rural Canada, and for the North are aimed at that.

I know that to reach the generous ambition that I have for my country – Canada on the podium of the sustainable economy – we will need the full skills and talents of all Canadians. We will all need to be members of Team Canada. And to pull together such a team, the Liberal Party is second to none. We are the party of the Charter of Rights, the Official Languages Act, multiculturalism, aboriginal rights. We
must bring down any, and all, barriers that prevent women, young people, aboriginals, new Canadians, visible minorities from offering their full potential to this great country.
Yes. To succeed, we cannot leave anyone behind. That’s why rather than cutting another $5 billion from the GST, I proposed investing in the Child Tax Benefit to bring eight hundred thousand children out of poverty and give them a decent start in life. That’s why I proposed an income tax benefit to help those on welfare make the transition to work. And that’s why I proposed an education passport for young
aboriginals that gives them a universal right to post secondary education anywhere in Canada. I say that these choices are not only about a just society, they make for smart economics too. That’s the Liberal way to success in the sustainable economy.
To succeed, we need a federation where, more than ever, all levels of government work together, respecting each others’ jurisdictions. Above all, we need a Canada more united than ever. A Canada where we Quebecers, with our own culture, our own talents, our own potential, will work hand in hand with other Canadians. Quebecers, Canada belongs to all of us, in its entirety. It is here together that we
realize our dreams, our aspirations, our ambitions for the world. No more blocs, enough blockages! I will always defend with conviction and clarity the rights that we Quebecers have on our entire country :
Canada. We are proud Quebecers, proud Canadians, and we are right to not choose between these two wonderful identities.
Will Canada be a leader in the 21st Century? Will we help human kind reconcile with the planet? I know Canada can do it. The only thing that is lacking is the political will.
Liberals, remember 1993. Our country was close to bankruptcy, soaring unemployment was destroying lives. Canadians were told by Conservatives to expect the same despair for a decade. We Liberals committed to put this nation to work, to restart this economy. We delivered with Jean Chrétien, with Paul Martin, with all Canadians.
This weekend, in Montreal, I invite each of us to commit to tackle, with the same determination, the issue of our time: sustainable development. And, with Canadians, we will deliver again.
A year ago, in this very room, I brought the world together to fight Climate Change. Today, allow me, to bring the Liberal party together – to fight for the future of Canada.
Choose me as your leader, and I know that together, we will beat Stephen Harper in the next election.
Canadians will embrace our generous vision of a prosperous Canada, a just Canada, a sustainable Canada.
We will do it together, for our children, the generations yet to come, and for the role of Canada in the world.
And, we will do it with a united Liberal Party and a United Canada!
Thank you.

[Source: Stephane Dion Campaign]

The Star lines up for Rae

The Toronto Star, Canada’s largest paper by circulation, thinks Liberals ought to elect former Ontario premier Bob Rae as their next leader:

Ignatieff, Dion and Kennedy each embody many of the qualities that Canadians expect in a Liberal leader and potential prime minister. Their ideals and energy have enriched the party. That bodes well for its future.

But, in the Star's view, Rae is the person who should lead a revitalized Liberal team into the next election. He offers the best prospect of renewing the party, moving it boldly forward in a socially progressive direction and giving Canadians the government they deserve. [Read the whole thing…]

Dion gets it from all over

Jason Cherniak, who is Liberal leadership candidate Stephane Dion’s point man in the blogosphere, makes a neat observation: Dion has managed to win endorsements for the top Liberal spot from left-of-centre Toronto Star columnist Haroon Siddiqui; the right-of-centre establishment voice that is the Globe and Mail’s editorial board; and from the further right-of-centre blue-collar editorial writers at the Toronto Sun.

Siddiqui:

“Dion is Captain Canada. As the author of the Clarity Act, he showed conviction and courage amid much abuse in his home province. Canadians owe him a deep gratitude for tethering the separatists to the rule of law, Canadian law.”

The Globe:

“What he lacks in charisma he makes up for in common sense. He possesses a remarkably clear-eyed view of the possibilities. That he has been the most lucid on the crucial unity file is unsurprising, but he has also presented a compelling vision of a 21st-century environmental economy. If a leader is going to exercise mastery over any files, those are among the most important.
But Mr. Dion has mastered more than that. Through the campaign, he has shown that he has mastered the art of politics. He has gained a love of the game, perhaps from watching the likes of Mr. Chrétien close up. While he has been burdened with an image as a stiff academic, he has added humour, passion and humility to his defining attributes of intelligence and principle.
There is no perfect choice for Liberal delegates, but Stéphane Dion comes the closest to deserving their support for leader.”

Here’s the Sun:

“Stephane Dion [is] our choice for leader because he was willing to fight for Canadian unity when it counted, despite the fact most of his academic peers in Quebec were separatists, who made his life hell. That took courage. While we think he's out to lunch in his support of the pie-in-the-sky Kyoto accord, we also think he's smart enough and tough enough to be a leader. “

 

 

 

Liberals scream for Dean

Howard DeanThe Liberal Party of Canada announced today that Howard Dean (left), Chairman of the [US] Democratic National Committee, will be the keynote speaker at the party’s leadership and policy convention in Montreal next month.

“We are proud to have Gov. Dean address our Party. Aside from our obvious affinity with the Democratic Party, Liberals are excited to hear the Chairman’s views on a modern democracy and the role of the Democratic Party in the new U.S. political environment. And the timing couldn’t be better,” said Steven MacKinnon, General Secretary of the Convention.

Dean, of course, was one of the architects of the Democrats electoral success this week in the United States.

 

Salongate — well, almost

Rona AmbroseSome Conservative supporters who have commented at this blog wonder why reporters like me can’t turn the “hairdresser” comments directed at Environment Minister Rona Ambrose (left) into the same kind of media circus that Peter MacKay was subjected to over the alleged dog comment.

Well, we stand ready and willing, of course, but those darn Liberals won’t co-operate. Today, during Question Period, we had our Salongate reporters and anchors all primed for action for there was Liberal John Cannis, the MP for Scarborough Centre, heckling Ambrose with comments that sounded like “she’s too busy at the hair salon to do her job.” We could see Tories like John Baird nearly jumping out of their seat as they pointed across the aisle with an accusatory “A-ha!” Here were Liberals engaging in the same kind of sexist behaviour that they had so high-and-mightily accused their Foreign Affairs Minister of engaging in!

But, unfortunately for all of us who would have been keen to pursue Salongate for the next five days, the Liberals refused to play fair. For as soon as Question Period ended, Cannis hopped to his feet and confessed to the House that he had behaved badly and was sorry. “I … made a comment while the Minister of the Environment was speaking, referring to a hair salon. I wish to withdraw those words. If they were offensive and offended anybody, I wish to apologize..”

But a faint glimmer of hope for those who wish this to dominate our news coverage for the next week: Maybe it wasn’t Cannis! Maybe it was his seatmate, Raymond Bonin, the MP from Nickel Belt, who slurred the Environment Minister. At least that’s what Conservative House Leader Rob Nicholson thought, for he rose to his feet immediately after Cannis apologized, to solemnly accuse Bonin of behaving badly.

“The member for Nickel Belt(‘s) … comment was overheard by my colleagues… saying that she should go back to the hair salon, so they were similar to the comments made by the hon. member for Scarborough Centre. These are sexist comments and an insult to everyone in the chamber and I wonder if he would withdraw those comments as well?”

But Bonin, sadly, is no Cannis.

Mr. Speaker, the member might have heard someone from this area, but I can assure you on my honour that I did not say that.”

And with that, we redeployed our Salongate reporters to the fiscal imbalance.

What's all the barking about?

The Liberals — ever helpful 🙂 — have generously freed up some space on their Web server to host an audio-taped recording of the now infamous “dog” exchange between Liberal MP David McGuinty and Foreign Affairs Minister Peter MacKay.

There is an MP3 audio version of the file and a video version for Windows Media Player.

I suggest the video version. The Liberals have added subtitles. Unless you know exactly what you’re looking for, it’s hard to hear the exchange on the audio file. Environment Minister Rona Ambrose had the floor at the time of the exchange and, under House broadcasting rules, the camera was required to be focused only on her and only her desk microphone would have been ‘hot’. The microphone, then, picking up the exchange would have been hers.

MacKay sits one row forward from Rona and four seats or so to her left. McGuinty is almost straight across the aisle from MacKay but in the fourth row.

 

Belinda on a point of order

At the conclusion of the daily Question Period in the House of Commons, Belinda Stronach, Liberal MP for the Newmarket-Aurora, rose on a point of order. This excerpt is courtesy of the Question Period “Blues” — which is the ‘rush’ transcript provided by Parliamentary staff. The ‘official’ Hansard transcript may be slightly different:

Hon. Belinda Stronach (Newmarket—Aurora, Lib.) :
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Standing Order 18 reads as follows:
No Member shall speak disrespectfully of the Sovereign, nor of any of the Royal Family, nor of the Governor General or the person administering the Government of Canada; nor use offensive words against either House, or against any Member thereof. No Member may reflect upon any vote of the House, except for the purpose of moving that such vote be rescinded.

Yesterday during question period the Minister of Foreign Affairs used a very inappropriate word to describe me. This is not the first time he and his party have revealed their true colours regarding respect for women in politics and how chilling this behaviour is for those women who contemplate entering politics.

For that, Mr. Speaker, I simply ask that the Minister of Foreign Affairs apologize to this House.

*   *   *

The Speaker :
As I indicated yesterday when this matter was raised, the news of these statements is something that is new to me because I did not hear the comments or see any of the gestures that are alleged to have taken place.

My staff have carefully reviewed the audio tapes of question period and the written transcript of Hansard which I myself have seen and of course there is no reference to these words in either. So, I am unable to confirm any of the suggestions that have been made. I know several members say they have heard these remarks.

In the circumstances there is nothing further I can do at this time. Obviously there may be further submissions on this point later.

*   *   *

Ms. Judy Wasylycia-Leis (Winnipeg North, NDP) :
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. To make matters worse, during question period when I was asking a very serious question about the demeaning and sexist actions of one member of the Conservative benches, a member over here on the back bench of the Conservatives, I believe the member for Cypress Hills—Grasslands was heard to say “stop whining”.

I find that offensive and contrary to the spirit of this chamber. It makes a bad situation worse.
I hope now that we will have apologies from this government on all sides, specifically with respect to that remark about whining, when we are raising a very serious matter that affects the women of this country and the members from all sides in this place.

*   *   *

Hon. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC) :
Mr. Speaker, I would state, as the Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister did on many occasions during question period today, that I think it is incumbent upon all of us and I know that I have worked hard over the past number of months with my whip colleagues from all three of the opposition parties to try and restore some additional decorum to the House and to work with you, Mr. Speaker.

Certainly that is the action that we are endeavour to take. I am sure all the other parties would like to see greater decorum in the House. We are committed to that.

*   *   *

The Speaker :
The opportunities for the Chair to intervene in respect of language used in the House, as hon. members know, are limited. We do enjoy freedom of speech in this House. Members are free to say what they want within fairly wide limits and the Chair enforces those broad limits.

The list of language that is unparliamentary is relatively short. Obviously words can be used in ways that are considerably impolite or improper in respect of other members. It may result in intervention by the Chair in certain circumstances.

I caution all hon. members to bear in mind that we do enjoy freedom of speech in this House. Members ought to conduct themselves in ways that are in accordance with the high expectations that Canadians have in members in electing them to serve in this place.

While I cannot hear everything that is said, especially when a lot of people are speaking at one time, I would urge hon. members to show proper caution in their use of language in the House and decent respect to each other because we are all elected to serve in this place, even though we may have differing political opinions.

*   *   *

Mr. David McGuinty (Ottawa South, Lib.) :
Mr. Speaker, in your remarks a moment ago you said you were not in a position having had your staff examine both the transcript and the audio tape.

On this side of the House at least a dozen Liberal members heard the comment. May I respectfully suggest or submit to the Chair that in this case, given the particularly egregious breach of parliamentary conduct by a minister of the Crown, that the tape in question be sent out to a professional audio house, at which point the tape can then be examined more closely and we can actually look more closely to see whether in fact the Minister of Foreign Affairs made the comments when he scurrilously referred to a member of Parliament on this side of the house as a dog.

*   *   *

The Speaker :
I am getting tired of this one. The hon. member for Mississauga South.

*   *   *

Mr. Paul Szabo (Mississauga South, Lib.) :
Mr. Speaker, in matters where there have been questions of whether or not something occurred, those matters have been referred to the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs where the committee can call persons who would know. Certainly persons sitting in the proximity of the Minister of Foreign Affairs would be able to answer the question on behalf of the House.

*   *   *

The Speaker :
Members can move motions to refer matters to the committee should they choose to do so. It is not for the chair to move motions in this House referring matters to committee. On a question of privilege, I may be able to do so. We have not had a question of privilege in this case. We have had points of order in respect of this case. It would not be for the chair to suggest that motions are the way to resolve those matters. That is not something in my jurisdiction.