NDP got billions; Libs got a working group

The NDP is less than impressed with Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff's ability to wring concessions from the government in return for his party's support. You will no doubt hear the following from every NDP spinner on every platform over the next 24-48 hours:

In 2005, Jack Layton won $4.6 billion in new investments in housing and transit in exchange for supporting the minority government of Paul Martin.

In 2009, Michael Ignatieff got a working group and an opposition day for supporting the minority government of Stephen Harper.

Liberal press release: Ignatieff and Harper come to terms

This just in from the Liberals, spelling out the deal that has been struck. One key to note — Liberals get a chance in late September to table a non-confidence motion so if they want a fall election, that will give them the opportunity. Otherwise, Liberals would not have had that chance until the fall:

For Immediate Release

June 17, 2009

Liberals announce Employment Insurance working group and fall accountability framework

OTTAWA – The Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition today agreed to form a working group to develop proposals for Employment Insurance eligibility reform that will:

(a) allow self-employed Canadians to participate voluntarily in the Employment Insurance system; and

(b) improve eligibility requirements in order to ensure regional fairness.

The working group will consist of three appointees of the Prime Minister and three appointees of the Leader of the Opposition.

The working group will have access to briefings and data provided by the Department of Human Resources and Skills Development. It may consult such other sources as deemed necessary.

The working group will deliver recommendations to the Prime Minister, the Leader of the Opposition and Canadians by September 28, 2009.

The parties will work in good faith to implement any consensus recommendations made by the working group.

In addition, the Liberals will support the main and supplementary estimates this Friday.

The Conservatives will support the Liberal opposition day motion (a draft copy of which is attached), also this Friday.

-30-

Contact:

Press Office

Office of the Leader of the Opposition

613-996-6740

DRAFT MOTION

THAT this House recognizes that its constitutional role of holding the government to account requires regular, orderly, timely, and clearly understood procedural opportunities for doing so, while not unduly restricting the ability of the government to manage its legislative program, and therefore, notwithstanding any Standing Order or usual practice of this House, when the House adjourns on Friday, June 19th, 2009, it shall stand adjourned until 11:00 a.m. on Monday, September 14th, 2009, whereupon it will commence its fall sittings for the Supply Period ending on December 10th, 2009; provided that:

(i) the House will not sit the week beginning September 21st 2009 to avoid conflicts with G-20 meetings;

(ii) in addition to the accountability reports already required by the Liberal amendment to the 2009 Budget motion, the Government will prepare a further accountability report, meeting all the requirements of that said Liberal amendment, and table it in Parliament during the week of September 28th, 2009, to be followed by an allotted day for the Official Opposition two sitting days later; and

(iii) this House orders that section (10) of Standing Order 81 be amended by adding, immediately after paragraph (c) thereof, the following:

   ” (d) In each of the supply periods described in paragraph (a), the first allotted day shall be no earlier than the eighth sitting day and no later than the twelfth sitting day in that period; and no fewer than four nor more than seven sitting days shall be permitted to pass between allotted days within each period, provided that, in any case, the last allotted day in each period shall not be more than seven sitting days before the last sitting day in that period.”

_____

No money to paint Peggy's Cove's lighthouse? Cuzner has an idea..

From Members Statements today in the House of Commons:

Mr. Rodger Cuzner (Cape Breton—Canso, Lib.) (left): Mr. Speaker, I have a quiz for the House today. Where is the most famous and iconic lighthouse in all of Canada?

Some hon. members: Peggy's Cove!

Mr. Rodger Cuzner: Peggy's Cove. I did not hear anything from that side of the House, not because Conservatives do not know but because they are embarrassed they cannot find $25,000 to paint that international landmark.

Being a good Nova Scotian, I will offer them a few ideas. I will offer them a few suggestions. How about this? Fire the republican spin doctors they hired for one month's work. That is $25,000 right there.

Fire the psychic “style” consultant the Prime Minister has. The way they missed on the budget projections, they are not listening to her anyway.

Shrink the size of cabinet. If they shrink the size of cabinet, they could paint the Peggy's Cove lighthouse 156 times.

Slash the $1 billion that they have been using for consultants. They could paint 40,000 tourist landmarks with that one move alone.

The lighthouse is on over there but nobody is home. It is time to come out of the fog and paint the lighthouse in Peggy's Cove.

Later, during the daily Question Period which follows Members Statements, Conservative MPs James Bezan and Nova Scotia Gerald Keddy had this exchange of lob-balls on the subject:

Mr. James Bezan (Selkirk—Interlake, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the lighthouse at Peggy's Cove and the entrance to St. Margaret's Bay is recognized by all Canadians and citizens of many countries around the world.Can the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade assure the House that this national icon will indeed receive the upkeep it needs?  

Mr. Gerald Keddy (Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of International Trade, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the lighthouse at Peggy's Cove is in my riding of South Shore—St. Margaret's, and it is a tourist destination for nearly one million people a year.It should be noted that it is also near the monument to Swiss Air 111, which was erected in memory of the 229 men, women and children who perished in 1998 on Swiss Air 111.It should be noted that I spoke directly to the Minister of Fisheries and Oceans about this last fall. She has given clear orders for the lighthouse to be painted. It was not painted last fall. It will be painted this year.

The Liberal endgame on the election staredown

I usually don't like to use this blog for speculation and political punditry — my desk is next to two of the Hill's top pundits and I like to leave that to them — but one of the fascinating political battles on the Hill in the last several weeks has been Liberals versus NDP and, if there is a confidence motion to be voted on next week, it' may be more of a staredown between two opposition party rivals than a staredown between the government and the opposition.

The Liberals have long chafed at the fact that, under former leader Stephane Dion as well as under current leader Michael Ignatieff, they have voted with the minority Conservative government on matters of confidence. Under Dion, I got the sense voting with the governnment was partly the responsible thing to do but it was also a matter of realpolitik — the Dion Liberals never were ready to fight an election and got pummeled when Harper, frustrated he couldn't goad Dion into a fight, pulled the plug himself, despite his own fixed election date law.

Ignatieff has also stood up, as Leader of the Official Opposition, to vote to sustain the government on confidence matters but he has more success, in my view, in successfully convincing his colleagues and, perhaps, the country that there was a good, responsible reason for doing so, i.e. we're in the midst of a nasty recession and some stimulus spending has to happen.

Whatever the reason, the NDP has used each occasion of Liberal support for the government — and, as Jack Layton notes below, there have been 71 — to deride that party for being nothing but driftless government wannabees. In the last parliament and in the last general election, the NDP painted itself as Canada's Effective Opposition, in contrast to the Liberal Official Opposition.

From an electoral standpoint, the NDP vs Liberal battle on this front seems to have paid some dividends for the NDP. The NDP won several Liberal-held ridings in northern Ontario, kept a seat in Quebec, won for the first time in Newfoundland and Labrador and holds the only seat in Alberta that is not held by a Conservative.

The Liberals know that, in the next electoral battle, they need to take back some of those seats to win the government and one of the ways I sense they hope to do that is to turn the tables on the NDP and get Layton to support the government by either voting with it on a confidence matter or failing to show up for the vote.

If the Liberals end up forcing an election next week, many Liberal MPs and staffers I've spoken to, are saying so be it. If they can force the NDP to blink and get the NDP to prevent a general election this summer, even better.

Layton, seems to be aware of that Liberal endgame and, yesterday after Question Period, he was asked about the prospects of a summer election:

The Hon. Jack Layton: Well I don't think Canadians are all that keen on a fourth election in five years, but I'll tell you, it's clear that the government's direction is the wrong direction. Looking at the statistics that are available — the unemployment rate being so high[and] the government's claiming that money's going out the door. It clearly isn't, if you talk to the mayors, which I've done. And I think we'll just have to see what the Liberals do. We have not brought a confidence motion forward. We brought a motion forward on pensions. It'll be voted on next week. But if the Liberals are counting on the NDP in some way, I think they should just look at our record over the last 71 confidence motions and they'll get an idea of where we're coming from.

Let the staredown begin.

"Flagrant examples of incompetence" could provoke election, says Ignatieff

Will Canadians be going to polls this summer? Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff said Tuesday he will make “a serene and clear decision” on that question — likely by June 12.

He cited the health crisis sparked by the shutdown of the nuclear reactor at Chalk River, Ont., which produces medical isotopes used to treat and diagnose 5,000 Canadians a day, as the latest of several “flagrant examples of incompetence” by the federal government.

After question period Tuesday, Ignatieff reeled off a growing list of what, to him, are irritants that could lead the Liberals to try to force an election. “I don't want an election. Canadians don't want an election,” Ignatieff told reporters outside the House of Commons. “But here's where I am . . . I'm trying to make Parliament work with a government that every day is displaying more flagrant examples of incompetence.

“We've got a major medical crisis with the isotopes. They've got no plan. Toronto Dominion Bank just announced that the deficit over five years will be $168 billion. That's the biggest number anybody has ever heard of. The public finances of this country are not under control.

“Third, we've got an unemployment crisis with unemployment surging across the country. We've got (three premiers) saying let's do something about a national standard for EI. We've got stimulus that needs to get out the door and only six per cent of the stimulus has actually reached the country in the middle of the construction season.” [Read the rest of the story]

Liberals roll out new fundraising, membership drives, aim for $25 million a year

At the risk of offending more readers like this one, I call your attention to the following press release this afternoon from the Liberal Party of Canada. That party — once known as the Big Red Machine — has been barely pale pink when it comes to finding new members or raising money in the last two or three years. Meanwhile, the Big Blue Machine has steamrolled all comers, consistently raising twice as much than all other federal parties combined from twice as many donors as all other parties combined. Liberals know that their political survival, let alone success, depends on them being able to at least do as well as the New Democrats when it comes to filling a war chest.

That is precisely why Rocco Rossi was named the party's exec director and why Bay Street lawyer Alfred Apps easily won the party's presidency. Both men have a long history of finding money for this cause or that one.

Mr. Apps explained that there are two main aspects to the fundraising plan, which was approved by the National Board of Directors, in consultation with the Council of Presidents. The first, to be called “The Leader’s Circle”, will create a group of existing donors responsible for encouraging the recruitment of new Laurier Club members. The second, designed to mark the first anniversary of the Victory Fund, will kick-start a two-year drive for growth in grassroots fundraising.

In addition to these fundraising initiatives, the plan also includes efforts to double the Party’s membership by Labour Day. This program, dubbed “The Power of One”, calls on every current member to recruit just one new member – a tradition the Party hopes will continue for generations of Liberals to come.

“What sets this membership and fundraising drive apart from others is the ambition, leadership and organizational strength of our Board of Directors,” said Rocco Rossi, National Director of the Liberal Party. “The energy and enthusiasm of our team will secure the long-term stable funding our Party needs to hold the Conservative to account, and to form the next government of Canada.”

These programs include a grassroots campaign which will capitalize on web-based social media to reach out to potential members and donors. In addition to more than doubling the membership, the Party hopes these initiatives increase fundraising levels to over $25 million on an annualized basis by 2011.

The daily snowball fight between Liberals and Conservatives

The 15 minutes directly before Question Period every day in the House of Commons is reserved for what are called Members Statements. MPs get 1 minute to say just about anything they want. Most of the time, MPs get up to acknowledge somebody or something special back in their riding, as Hamilton NDP MP Chris Charlton did today, when she saluted a slo-pitch league in her riding or when Liberal Michell Simson congratulated William McDonald for his work in helping veterans in her Toronto riding.

But recently, Members Statements has become a partisan battleground as Conservatives and Liberals throw verbal snowballs back and forth at each other across the aisle. (If you're counting, I'd say the Conservatives started this little fight last year, when they'd use Members Statements to pick on former Liberal Leader Stephane Dion and try to unnerve just before QP got started.)

Here's today's snowball fight, with Liberal Anthony Rota leading off:

M. Anthony Rota (Nipissing—Timiskaming, Lib.)Rota.jpg : Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives have become a single issue party. The issue is taxes. They want them higher and they will have more of them to pay for their staggering deficit. Their leader told the House two days ago he will not bring in another budget, and I quote, “until we need to raise taxes”. It is now clear: taxes will rise under the Conservatives.

In these tough economic times, that is not what Canadians need. We need a stable and focused leadership that only the Liberals can provide.

Ce gouvernement conservateur attaque les familles canadiennes qui travaillent fort, et ils veulent faire en sorte qu'il soit encore plus difficile pour les Canadiens de subvenir aux besoins de leur famille.

Tout court, les conservateurs causeront des impôts plus élevés.

Raising taxes to cover their incompetence is just plain wrong. I know it is wrong. The people of my riding know it is wrong, and all Canadians know it is wrong. It is only the Conservatives who have not figured it out yet.

The always excitable Jacques Gourde then threw one right back at the red team:

EyeTVSnapshot.jpgM. Jacques Gourde (Lotbinière—Chutes-de-la-Chaudière, PCC): Monsieur le Président, je veux rappeler au chef de l'opposition que l'enjeu aujourd'hui, ce n'est pas le déficit, c'est l'économie. Nous sommes en pleine récession mondiale et nous ferons tout ce qui est nécessaire pour protéger les Canadiens et les aider à surmonter la tempête économique.

Les mesures que nous prenons sont nécessaires, abordables et à court terme.

Nous ne présenterons pas d'excuses pour avoir fait des dépenses afin de stimuler l'économie, de protéger les emplois et d'appuyer les chômeurs. En fait, s'il devient nécessaire d'en faire encore plus, nous le ferons.

Les libéraux font preuve d'hypocrisie. D'un côté, ils critiquent la taille du déficit, et de l'autre, ils exigent que nous dépensions des milliards de dollars supplémentaires. Le chef libéral tourne au gré du vent et change de direction, comme un coq sur une grange. Par chez nous, on appelle cela une girouette.

There was a short break in the action while the aforementioned Ms. Charlton said something nice about people who slowly throw softballs at batters. And then Conservative Rodney Weston got back to throwing more mud at the Liberals:

EyeTVSnapshot[2].jpgMr. Rodney Weston (Saint John, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the Liberal leader is leading the Liberal Party down the path of hypocrisy and they are losing credibility with Canadians. On one hand the Liberal leader is in Toronto saying that he stands up for seal hunters, meanwhile, the Liberal Party's campaign boss is calling the hunt “appalling and more trouble than it's worth”.

Our Conservative government believes that seal hunters and their families are worth it. They are worth defending and our conservative government will continue to stand up for them.

The Liberal leader's biggest hypocrisy of all is on Canada's economy. On one hand they are attacking the size of the deficit and then on the other they are demanding billions and billions more in spending. They cannot have it both ways.

While the Liberal leader and his party continue on this path of hypocrisy, our Conservative government will continue to support and help Canadians during these tough economic times.

The BQ's Christiane Gagnon then jumped in with some criticism of Conservative Quebec MPs who, she felt, weren't standing up strong enough for the principal of appointing bilingual judges to the Supreme Court.

And then it was Liberal Scott Andrews' turn to get into it:

EyeTVSnapshot[3].jpgMr. Scott Andrews (Avalon, Lib.): Mr. Speaker, yesterday the Prime Minister admitted to the House that he is spending hours holed up in his basement, going through old tapes that he has collected on the Leader of the Opposition.

We knew the government was a bit shaky when it came to scientific novelties like the greenhouse effect and the theory of evolution, but who knew they missed the digital revolution as well.

The Prime Minister seems to be stuck in another political era. Who does the Prime Minister think he is, Richard Nixon?

What are these tapes the Prime Minister is talking about? Is he bugging the phone lines again, just like when they eavesdropped on the NDP? Are there microphones in our offices and cameras in the potted plants?

It is time for the Prime Minister to wake up, throw away his little spy cameras and start focusing on the mess that he and his government have made to this economy or else he may be remembered in political history as fondly as Richard Nixon.

Andrews finished that one with a nice flourish, raising his arms up over his head and doing Nixon's V-for-Victory gesture.

But then, batting cleanup for the Conservatives as he often does, rose the hulking form of Daryl Kramp, Kramp was once an OPP officer in rural eastern Ontario and, though he's a pretty gentle guy when you're chatting with him, I can't say as I would ever want to get him angry at me. Perhaps because of his intimidating physical and vocal presence, he often gets the last spot before QP starts, perhaps in the belief that he'll throw off the Leader of the Opposition who he knows will speak next, asking the first question of Question Period. Here's Kramp's effort today:

Mr. Daryl Kramp (Prince Edward—Hastings, CPC): Mr. Speaker, the Liberals are off in dreamland again. The issue is not the deficit, it is the economy. We are in a global recession, and the Conservatives will do whatever it takes to protect Canadians, to help them weather this economic storm.

The measures we are taking, they are necessary, they are affordable and they are short term, unlike the Liberal hypocrisy. On the one hand, they simply attack the size of the deficit and also demand billions more in spending.

As the Liberal leader revealed, their plan is to raise taxes on Canadian families and businesses. On April 14 he said “We will have to raise taxes”. He declared that a GST hike is on the table.

They support billions more on an east-west power grid, another $1 billion-plus on EI, $5 billion to bring back the Kelowna Accord that was written on the back of a napkin. The world economy is in a difficult position. Canada is a leader in this G8, but the Liberals are trying to spend us into oblivion. Canadians do not need taxes from the Liberals with their hands in the cookie jar.

In these times, only the Conservative government's steady leadership can keep us on the right track.

The most important paragraphs in Budget 2009

The Budget Plan is a 360-page document that contains everything you need to know about Budget 2009, tabled Jan. 27 by Finance Minister Jim Flaherty in the the House of Commons. The Plan contains all the background, rationale and details on how the government intends to collect and spend more than $200 billion between April 1, 2009 and April 1, 2010.

And while there are lots of important paragraphs in that document, I'm going to suggest that, politically at least, these paragraphs, found on page 10 of the hard-copy version, and found here on line, are now the most important:

Budget 2009 reflects a strong consensus among Canadians that the Government must deliver a potent economic stimulus to encourage growth and restore confidence in our economy. The Economic Action Plan is based on three guiding principles—that stimulus should be timely, targeted and temporary.

Timely. Canada is in recession today. Measures to support the economy must begin within the next 120 days to be most effective.

Targeted. Measures that target Canadian businesses and families most in need will trigger the largest increase in Canadian jobs and output.

Temporary. The stimulus plan should be phased out when the economy recovers to avoid long-term structural deficits.

The Government’s Economic Action Plan will provide almost $30 billion in support to the Canadian economy, or 1.9 per cent of our gross domestic product.

It will create or maintain close to 190,000 Canadian jobs.

These paragraphs contain a lot of the benchmarks that the opposition Liberals will hold Flaherty and the government to as the government presents its quarterly reports. The next quarterly report, as I report today, could be out as early as next week. So let's check in:

On the issue of timely: This document was tabled on January 27, 2009. That would be 120 days ago. Conservatives hve already tried to convince me that they really meant 120 days from April 1, the beginning of the budget year, but I see no such qualifier in the budget document.

On the issue of targeted. Liberals argue making it easier for more “families most in need” to qualify for EI is best.

On the issue of temporary. Liberals — and man Bay Street market watchers — would like some more explanation about how Flaherty gets us to deficit of $50 billion this year and then would like to hear some details on how he thinks this could be temporary.

The last point is also crucial: This is the line in which government commits to a certain job creation figure. The government gives itself an out when its says “create or maintain” but, still, Liberals will keep circling that number and will want to see progress on job creation.

"I don't want to die with a black mark on my name"

Doing what good journalists are supposed to do: Though we've had this letter since yesterday, we did our due diligence today, checking its bona fides which, as it turns out, are both bona and fide. As a result, my colleague Juliet O'Neill is able to update an earlier post here and report that:

A distraught 81-year-old Filipina is accusing embattled Liberal MP Ruby Dhalla (left) of “taking advantage” of her to falsely claim the support of the Brampton Filipino Seniors Club.

“They took my signature,” Aurora Villanueva, 2007-2008 president of the Ontario club, said in an interview Thursday. “I need to clear my name. I don't want to die with a black mark on my name.”

Ms. Villanueva says she wrote a letter on May 13th to the Commons immigration committee retracting a May 7th letter that said Ms. Dhalla had been “unjustly smeared” by allegations of mistreating caregivers, had a character of the highest integrity and had the support of the club.

Ms. Dhalla “took advantage of my being an old lady and being friendly” to secure her signature on a prepared letter a Ms. Dhalla representative brought to her home two weeks ago, when she was ill and unaware of the caregivers' allegations, she said.  

[Read the rest of the story]

Iggy, Gandhi — both were "Just Visiting"!

“The Visitor” ad, above, seems to be a creation of a Liberal supporter and is being distributed on YouTube. It spoofs the “Just Visiting” spot, below, which is a creation of The Conservative Party of Canada and is being shown as a paid ad on Canadian network television.

It seems clear that Liberals (I assume they are Liberals) are having a certain amount of fun riffing off of the Conservative “Just Visiting” attack ads. Here's one from the Libs that accuses Mahatma Gandhi of being a mere arriviste for Indian independence. I've put up the YouTube links to both ads here on the assumption that you need to see the original (on the bottom) in order to get the joke (on the top.)