Harper in Lviv, Ukraine: "Remember that in Canada, you have friends"

Here is the a lightly-edited (I have trimmed a bit and added links and bold-face) speech Prime Minister Stephen Harper was to give a thte Ukrainian Catholic University in Lviv, Ukraine on the last day of his five-day trip to Europe:

“There are strong people-people links between our two countries.

“Ukrainians have been emigrating to Canada for more than 100 years and one and a quarter million Canadians have Ukrainian roots.  That’s about 4 per cent of the total population.  And that percentage is much higher on the Canadian prairies where I reside.  It’s a part of Canada that looks like parts of Ukraine and where you would recognize many of the surnames, as you would for members of the distinguished Ukrainian delegation that is travelling with me here.

“So this is like a homecoming for them.  And of course everywhere we go, we are seeing that wonderful hospitality for which Ukrainians are rightly famous.

“Now we’ve had some productive talks with your government.  I will come to one part of those discussions that may be of particular interest to you a little later.  But before that, I’m really here to speak to you about some other things, deeply important things, values and principles that Canada and Ukraine share.

“When Ukraine first declared independence in 1991, the first western country to recognize your status as a sovereign independent country was Canada.  And you might ask why were we so quick to do that?  What was the hurry?  For we didn’t wait very long.  You affirmed your independence on December 1st.  On December 2nd, we recognized your government and your statehood.  Even before, in fact, the Soviet Union had officially ceased to exist.

“Why? Now, some of you here certainly won’t remember the Cold War.  But I can tell you, certainly tell those of us who do, we heaved an enormous sigh of relief when Soviet communism was finally and irrefutably discredited.  The communist ideology had purported to be the cure for all that ails humanity.  It had just one problem.  Before it could work its miracles, it had to jail or kill every living soul who disagreed.  And so millions were murdered and millions more were starved.  It is a past that must not be forgotten, that must never be swept under the carpet.

“Yesterday, I (see PMO photo on this page) visited the Holodomor memorial.

“Holodomor was of course officially recognized as a genocide by Canada’s parliament two years ago, largely thanks to the work of my caucus colleagues, in particular James Bezan, who in fact introduced the legislation.  Now as you know, almost as many Ukrainians died in the Holodomor during the 1930s as there were Canadians alive at that time. To contemplate an act of malevolence on that scale truly focuses one’s mind on the nature of this evil.  So much for communism’s supposed ideals.

“Of course through it all for years, for decades, thousands of Ukrainian Canadians demonstrated at every reasonable opportunity to raise awareness in the west of Soviet oppression.  They did so because they knew all too well that their brethren back in Ukraine had no such freedom.  And among the leaders of this Ukrainian Canadian vanguard was a parliamentarian from Toronto, named Yuri Shimko, a descendant of Ivan Franko who I know is revered in this city and throughout western Ukraine.

“So, yes, Canadians did rejoice when we saw that ideology of Soviet communism consigned to history’s scrap heap.  And when Ukraine reclaimed its freedom, we were more than ready to reach out to those who had lived under communism for all those horrible years.

“Besides the bonds of kinship that exist between Canada and Ukraine, there are important values and principles to promote.  As Canadians, we believe that a government must work in the interests of its people, not the other way around.  We believe that countries which respect the rights of their own people are more likely to respect the rights of other nations and to be good world citizens.

“And we believe that countries where citizens know what their governments are doing and can hold them accountable are less likely to make war on their neighbours than those were power is the possession of an exclusive ruling class responsible to nobody.  There are exceptions.  There have been exceptions.  There always will be. But the exceptions of anything prove the general rule.  If peace is your goal, then a free and democratic society is the way to go.

“Therefore, the cornerstone of Canada’s foreign policy is the promotion of such values: freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, and all the institutions that come with them: property rights, an impartial judiciary, and above all, freedom of expression and a free press. The freedom for which Gongadze became a hero.

“In fact, we do not believe that you can have any one of these things: freedom, democracy, human rights and the rule of law, without the others.  But the first is freedom.  So that when Ukraine rejoined the brotherhood of the free, we in Canada were among the first to cheer.

“And we have tried to be more than mere spectators.  As a friend of Ukraine, we have done a few things intended to widen your road to democratic reform.  These have been both done at the governmental level and informally through community and trade organizations.  First was the establishment of embassies and consulates immediately after Ukrainian independence.  It tells you something about your Canadian cousins, that when the Ukrainian embassy opened in Ottawa, the cost of it was largely covered by the Ukrainian-Canadian community, a great example of how active that community is.

“Since then there have been high-level delegations travelling back and forth, visits to Ukraine by three of our governors general, and twice to Canada by your own presidents.

“And I am proud to point out that Canadians have repeatedly participated as observers in Ukrainian elections in 2004, 2006, 2007 and again this year.

“Canadians are happy to assist with elections because it is in the choosing of the government by the governed that freedom becomes more than just a word.

“There have been many government contacts at an operational level and the Canadian International Development Agency has assisted with programs to encourage small business.  In fact today we are announcing six more projects to foster growth and boost grain exports.  And of historic importance, we are now working with your government towards a Canada-Ukraine free-trade agreement.  Our economies complement each other in several ways and it should be possible to lever our historic and linguistic ties to stimulate trade investment and job creation.

“Trade builds prosperity for everyone and it presents particularly great opportunities for young people such as yourselves who have a global perspective. I said earlier there was something in the current rounds of talks with your government that should be of particular interest to this audience.  For many years, our two countries have had a program through which as many as 50 Ukrainian university students a year come to Canada to work as interns in our parliament to see how our parliament works.  I’m happy to tell you that yesterday, we took that idea much further and way beyond the confines of government.

“Yesterday, our government signed a youth mobility agreement so that young Canadians and young Ukrainians will find it easier to travel between our two countries and work in each other’s. Obviously as Canadians we want to keep strong and vital the close relationship that we have with the Ukraine.  We would love to see lots of you come to Canada, both for work and to have some fun.  All we ask is that while you are in Canada, to teach us more about your Ukraine and make sure you share your Canadian experiences with your friends.  Tweet about what you see, post the best of your photos of Canada on Facebook.  You can help all of us to become better friends.

“Now, ladies and gentlemen, I just want to conclude with this.  Your country has been in transition for 20 years.  Just as nobody could have predicted the past two decades, no one can say what the future holds.  But it is a great time to be alive.

“In fact, as I look about me, I am reminded of a fragment of poetry.  Bliss was it in that dawn to be alive, but to be young was very heaven.  For ultimately what your country becomes, how it responds to the turns of future history and how you live as citizens, all this will be up to you and your generation.  You have great things ahead of you, great things to decide.  A whole destiny to shape.

“I would therefore say this not only to you but to all the fine young people of Ukraine.

“As you set about your life’s work, remember that in Canada, you have friends.  Friends who respect and admire Ukraine’s heart for freedom, its spirit of national self-determination, and the courage of its people, a courage that has never deserted you, even in the darkest nights of your long history.

“As Shevchenko wrote, and I quote: ‘Strive and you will triumph for God is on your side. The rewards are glory, truth, and that most sacred of things, freedom.’

“I look forward to meeting all of you and I wish all of you good luck in your future.  Slava Ukraini! Slava Canada!”

 

Max Boot on Afghanistan: The Case for Optimism

Max Boot, the Jeane J. Kirkpatrick Senior Fellow in National Security Studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, does not believe that negotiations between some Taliban leaders and NATO forces, under way now in Afghanistan will come to much. In fact, as he writes in a recent essay, he believes there is reason to be optimistic about the U.S. military surge in that country. Some excerpts:

Nobody should be under any illusions that such efforts will transform Afghanistan into Switzerland. But that isn't the goal. Afghans, like residents of Illinois and New Jersey, will tolerate a certain degree of corruption. What they won't accept is the brazen, unconstrained thievery practiced by all too many government officials today, who demand a bribe to perform the simplest service, whether allowing a motorist to pass a checkpoint or a farmer to file a legal grievance against an interloper who has stolen his land. Bribes are also necessary to secure many government jobs—which in turn necessitates that officials collect more bribes to pay for the cost of office. A recent survey of 6,500 Afghans by the international group Integrity Watch Afghanistan found that 70 percent perceive corruption as a problem and that 50 percent “consider that corruption fosters the expansion of the Taliban.” The figures are even higher in Kandahar and other areas where, no coincidence, the Taliban have displayed the most strength …

If coalition forces, working with honest Afghans (yes, they do exist), can reduce the overall level of corruption, they can do much to reduce the insurgency's appeal. As things stand, the Taliban posture, rather hypocritically, as the incorruptible guardians of Islamic virtue fighting against the crooks who dominate the current government and against the foreign soldiers who are seen as their enablers. Reduce the level of corruption and popular anger will be directed where it belongs—against the Taliban, with their unpopular, antediluvian ideology and history of brutal, horrifying violence.

The idea that we can strike an acceptable deal with the Taliban—one of the most popular Plan B's under discussion—is especially far-fetched. While talks are evidently going on between representatives of President Hamid Karzai and elements of the Taliban leadership, there is scant cause to think that the insurgents are willing to give up their arms or to become a peaceful opposition party. As CIA director Leon Panetta said on June 28: “We have seen no evidence that they are truly interested in reconciliation where they would surrender their arms, where they would denounce al-Qaeda, where they would really try to become part -of that society.”

… Some rural Pashtuns might see a return of the Taliban as an acceptable alternative to the kind of predatory misrule they suffer from today. But such a deal would be significantly less appealing for the vast majority of Afghans who take for granted freedoms that the Taliban would quickly quash—freedoms like flying kites, listening to music, and educating their daughters.

David Cole: What to Do About Guantánamo?

This morning, at his trial at Guantanamo Bay U.S. Naval Station, Canadian Omar Khadr pleaded guilty to murder, attempted murder, supporting terrorism, conspiracy and spying.

Meanwhile, there is this essay from David Cole, a long-time critic of the Guantanamo process. He is reviewing:

The Guantánamo Lawyers: Inside a Prison Outside the Law
edited by Mark P. Denbeaux and Jonathan Hafetz
NYU Press, 420 pp., $32.95

Because It Is Wrong: Torture, Privacy and Presidential Power in the Age of Terror
by Charles Fried and Gregory Fried
Norton, 222 pp., $24.95

The Guantánamo Review Task Force Final Report

And writes:

“..what the island symbolizes for the rest of the world: a monument to lawlessness, a prison erected for detaining, interrogating, and brutalizing suspected terrorists without having to account for their status, condition, or treatment to anyone—not to the detainees themselves, their families, their countries of origin, the courts, or the American people. As originally conceived by the Bush administration, Guantánamo was a hole into which suspects would for all practical purposes disappear, never to be heard from again.”

….

 

One of the most moving entries in The Guantánamo Lawyers is an account by Muneer Ahmad of his Canadian client Omar Khadr’s decision to fire him. Lawyers, Ahmad argues, take a long view, recognizing that what is ultimately at issue is a struggle to change cultural understandings and assumptions. For the detainees, however, kept isolated for years on end at Guantánamo, such change is altogether too abstract. Still, Ahmad insists,

It would be a mistake to say that Omar was concerned merely with short-term relief…while we were concerned with the long-term goal of his release. The difference between us was rather more profound and concerned competing judgments about how best to achieve the long-term goal. In the beginning of our relationship, Omar gave law, and us, the benefit of the doubt. But over time, he…came to see law as the government’s tool of oppression rather than his and the other detainees’ instrument for liberation.

 

Leading A1: Refugee fraudsters; Williams confession; dumpster baby

A1 Headlines and Political Daybook

Listen!

Recycle

Refugee fraudsters; Williams confession; dumpster baby; get an audio summary of what's topping the front pages of Thursday's papers across the country by clicking on the “AudioBoo” link (left).

You can also get these audio summaries automatically every day via podcast from iTunes or via an RSS feed by subscribing to my AudioBoo stream. Both the iTunes link and the RSS link are at my profile at AudioBoo.fm. Look in the top right corner of the “Boos” box.

Technorati Tags: 

 

Leading A1: Calgary's Muslim mayor; Falun Gong win; the Belleville trial

A1 Headlines and Political Daybook

</tbody

Listen!
Dominique Michel

Calgary's Muslim mayor; Falun Gong win; the Belleville trial; get an audio summary of what's topping the front pages of papers across the country by clicking on the “AudioBoo” link (left).

You can also get these audio summaries automatically every day via podcast from iTunes or via an RSS feed by subscribing to my AudioBoo stream. Both the iTunes link and the RSS link are at my profile at AudioBoo.fm. Look in the top right corner of the “Boos” box.

Technorati Tags: 

 

Leading A1: Waiting for a killer; V-day in Alberta; no male teachers

Rob Ford

A1 Headlines and Political Daybook

Waiting for a killer; V-day in Alberta; no male teachers : Get a five-minute audio summary of what's on Monday's front pages of papers across the country by clicking on the link below.

Listen!

You can also get these audio summaries automatically every day via podcast from iTunes or via an RSS feed by subscribing to my AudioBoo stream. Both the iTunes link and the RSS link are at my profile at AudioBoo.fm. Look in the top right corner of the “Boos” box.

Technorati Tags: 

 

 

 

National Digital Libraries: Where are they?

Robert Darnton, the director of the Harvard University Library, is making a pitch for the U.S. to create a National Digital Library, “that is, a comprehensive library of digitized books that will be easily accessible to the general public.”

“All sorts of initiatives that could be useful and instructive in the creation of a National Digital Library,” Darnton says. “Think of HathiTrust, the Internet Archive, the [Canadian] Knowledge Commons Initiative, the California Digital Library, the Digital Library Federation, the National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program, and other nonprofit enterprises.”

But Darnton also said this:

”Virtually every developed country has launched some kind of national digital library, and many developing countries are doing the same.”

Really?

Would love to know what they are. What, for instance, is Canada's national digital library? Many might point to Collections Canada, the site maintained by Library And Archives Canada, the federal government institution. And there's the Bilbiothèque et Archives Nationales du Québec. But neither is really, as Darnton defines it in his essay, “a comprehensive library of digitized books that will be easily accessible to the general public.”

My Twitter friend Alison Loat helpful points out that there is an initiative underway in Ontario to get an Ontario Digital Library a la Darnton up and running.

Anyhow: I've asked my Facebook friends and my Twitter tweeps if they have some examples of national digital libraries. I'll post links here if I can find 'em.

 

Absolutely fascinating: John Sculley on Steve Jobs

I've run into John Sculley  and shot the breeze with him whenever I've attended my favourite conference, PopTech, in Camden, Maine. Sculley has a fabulous place there just down the street from the opera house that is PopTech's home. I was a tech reporter back then, back in the days when the Internet was all new (I was an AOL member when it had less than 5,000 members, so there) and ebay and Amazon.com had yet to be invented.

One of the companies that fascinated me then — and still does — is Apple. Sculley was Apple's CEO for a decade or so in the mid-1980s to the mid-1990s. He'd come to Apple from Pepsi where he had great success marketing the hell out of Pepsi and stealing Coke's market share and Apple's board wanted him to do the same thing with computers.

In this fabulously interesting interview, Sculley admits that he didn't know a thing about computers — one reason why he made the near-disastrous decision to stick with Motorola processor rather than Intel's x86 processor in the 1990s — and he talks a lot about Steve Jobs and how Jobs apparently doesn't talk to Sculley anymore.

Jobs was Apple's largest single shareholder when Sculley got hired as CEO but, though Jobs wanted to be CEO, the Apple board of directors picked Sculley instead.

Sculley would eventually get fired by Apple's board. Wikipedia has this verdict on Sculley's tenure at Apple:

“Sculley increased Apple's sales from $800 million to $8 billion. However, his stint at Apple remains controversial due to his departure from founder Steve Jobs's sales structure, particularly regarding his decision to compete with IBM in selling computers to the same types of customers. He was ultimately forced out of Apple in 1993 as the company's margins eroded, sales diminished and stock declined”

Two CEOs later, Jobs came back (I think the stock was around $13 then and is now about to hit or has hit $300), rescued the company, and the rest is history.

Apple, obviously, is Steve Jobs and Steve Jobs is Apple. But Sculley (pictured above next to a very young Jobs) was there for some important moments in Apple's history — the development of AppleTalk and of QuickTime, for instance — and, if you're at all a geek, this interview is an absolutely fascinating must-read.

"The most idiotic communications strategy yet devised by this PMO, and that’s saying something"

L. Ian MacDonald's current gig is editor of Policy Options but, back in the day, he worked for former Progressive Conservative Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. And though relations between the old Mulroney gang and the current Stephen Harper gang can be occasionally bumpy, I think MacDonald is generally cheering for the blue team when push comes to shove.

But in his column in the Sun today, MacDonald says Harper's blue team had, this week, what amounted to its “worst day since his government took office four and a half years ago.” That would be Tuesday, when Canada lost, for the first time ever, a bid for a seat on the UN security council. That's bad enough, MacDonald writes, but then:

“To make a complete botch of the day, the damage control strategy of the Prime Minister’s Office was to blame the failure of the UN bid on Michael Ignatieff’s comments that Canada didn’t deserve a seat on the Security Council. From his dumb to their dumber.

This is the most idiotic communications strategy yet devised by this PMO, and that’s saying something.”

MacDonald has the full scorecard for Harper's dismal scorecard in today's paper.

Leading A1: Khadr's deal; a killer's pension; Maclean's in trouble again!

Nine Police Officers Suspended

A1 Headlines and Political Daybook

Khadr's deal; a killer's pension; Maclean's in trouble again! : Get a five-minute audio summary of what's on Friday's front pages of papers across the country by clicking on the link below.

Listen!

You can also get these audio summaries automatically every day via podcast from iTunes or via an RSS feed by subscribing to my AudioBoo stream. Both the iTunes link and the RSS link are at my profile at AudioBoo.fm. Look in the top right corner of the “Boos” box.

Technorati Tags: