Premier fiddles for Nova Scotia

Have you seen this yet? It’s terrific! The government department at Nova Scotia responsible for attracting visitors and businesses to the province has put up a “Top Ten List for Dave Letterman to Visit Nova Scotia.” The idea was inspired by an appearance on the late night talk show by Ellen Page, a Nova Scotia-born actor who was on Letterman recently to talk about the film she’s in, Juno, and ended up praising the virtues of her home province.

The “Top Ten” list is smart and funny — and the capper comes from Premier Rodney Macdonald,  who is himself a very capable down-home fiddler in a long line of terrific fiddlers from Mabou, Cape Breton.

 

Harper lines up behind Lunn

Prime Minister Harper was in New Brunswick today to an announce an aid package for one-industry towns that have been hit with downturns. While there, he took some questions about the AECL-Lunn thing. He commended the actions of Lunn and others and took some shots at Linda Keen, the president of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission. I’ll post his comments later.

In the meantime, here’s a statement just out from Lunn’s office:

OTTAWA, ONTARIO–(Marketwire – Jan. 10, 2008) – The Honourable Gary Lunn, Minister of Natural Resources, commented on the decision by the new Board of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) to release the report of a special examination of the Crown corporation prepared by the Auditor General for Canada.

Under the Financial Administration Act, all Crown corporations must undergo a special examination of this type at least once every five years.

“AECL is an important public asset, and releasing this report gives Canadians an opportunity to understand more about how the company works and some of the challenges it is facing,” said Minister Lunn. “I'm proud that the Government of Canada is already taking care of these challenges.”

The report of the Auditor General focussed on the need to address long-standing strategic challenges relating to the Advanced CANDU Reactor program, the Dedicated Isotope Facility and the aging infrastructure at Chalk River Laboratories.

“We are in complete agreement with this finding. That is why I announced in November that my department will lead a comprehensive review of AECL,” said Minister Lunn. “This is what good governance is about. We want to make sure we have the information we need before we make any decisions that will affect AECL's long-term future.”

Minister Lunn also noted that the Government has made a number of appointments to fill vacancies on the AECL Board of Directors, which helped to address another of the concerns of the Auditor General's special examination on the issue of leadership at AECL.

The report of the Auditor General was completed well in advance of the licensing issue that led to the prolonged shut-down of the National Research Universal (NRU) Reactor that arose in late November 2007.

Provincial economies set to slow

Just in time for a meeting between Prime Minister Harper and the premiers Friday night, the economists at TD Bank released today their provincial outlook for 2007–08. Highlights:

  • Deteriorating  export  picture setting the stage for slow growth across the provinces in 2008
  • Real  GDP growth this year to limp along at about 1.5% in N&L, Ontario, Quebec and P.E.I.
  • Nova  Scotia and New Brunswick poised to expand at a slightly faster 2% rate
  • While  the  west  will  continue  to outperform, the region will not be immune to U.S. softness
  • Saskatchewan only province to record 3%+ growth in 2008
  • Provincial prospects somewhat brighter in 2009

Rubin calls $1.50 a litre gasoline

I had CIBC World Markets Chief Economist Jeff Rubin in a piece I did last week looking ahead to potentially high gas prices this spring and summer. Michael Ervin, at M.J. Ervin had predicted gas could peak at $1.30 a litre this spring. Rubin, in the same piece, said Canadians should get their heads around the idea of gas at $1.50 a litre.

Today, Rubin makes that forecast official:

Gobal Oil Supply Challenges Will Drive Gas to $1.50 litre: CIBC World Markets

Prices to hit US$150 a barrel within the next five years

TORONTO, Jan. 10, 2008 – CIBC (CM: TSX; NYSE) — Canadians should brace for $1.50 gallon gas prices in the near future as global oil supply will increasingly have trouble keeping pace with demand, forecasts a new energy report from CIBC World Markets.

The report predicts that surging demand in developing economies combined with accelerated depletion of existing supply and widespread delays in getting new oil fields up and running will see the global supply of oil fall as much as eight million barrels a day below U.S. Department of Energy and International Energy Agency estimates by 2012.

“Those projections ignore two fundamental forces that have, in recent years, brought global production to a virtual standstill,” says Jeff Rubin, Chief Strategist and Chief Economist at CIBC World Markets. “The first is depletion. You have to run faster to stand still. Depletion from existing fields has accelerated to over four per cent, a rate that currently cuts nearly four million barrels per day out of each year’s production.

“The second fundamental force blowing up supply forecasts is the huge project delays and massive cost overruns associated with many of the world’s largest new oil mega-projects. From Kazakhstan to Nigeria’s Delta region, protracted delays in some of the world’s largest energy mega-projects will have huge impacts on actual supply growth over the next five years.”

As part of its research, CIBC World Markets reviewed nearly 200 new oil projects slated to start production over the next five years and found that scheduled production timelines are far too optimistic, with project delays the norm, not the exception, among the group.

It found that heavy reliance on increasingly high cost and technically challenging fields like the Kashagan project in Kazakhstan, Russia’s Sakhalin II and Canadian and Venezuelan oil sands have left world supply growth vulnerable to a seemingly never-ending series of project delays.

Mr. Rubin notes that delays in the Venezuela and Canada will shave over 700,000 barrels a day from earlier 2012 production forecasts. In some nations, soaring development costs have resulted in complex and often tense re-negotiations of royalty agreements with host countries. Some have even led to either a temporary or indefinite suspension of operating licenses.

“Of course, stagnant conventional world oil production underlies the recent problems associated with harvesting unconventional supply. Virtually all of the increases in global oil production have occurred from deepwater fields or oil sands, with conventional production seemingly stuck at 2005 levels of 67 million barrels per day.”

These project delays are also happening at a time of accelerated global depletion in existing fields. The rate has climbed to over four per cent, which cuts nearly four million barrels per day out of each year’s production. The recent increases are in part, related to the growing importance of offshore, and, in particular, deepwater fields, which have depletion rates twice that of conventional fields.

“Cliff-like depletion rates have already been in evidence in the North Sea and now the huge Cantarell field in Mexico,” adds Mr. Rubin. “Since 2000, offshore fields have been the single-largest source of new supply growth. As their weight in total production increases, future depletion rates will continue to rise. Even holding the current depletion rate constant over the next five years, we must produce nearly 20 million barrels per day of new oil just to offset what will be lost through depletion during this period.”

Mr. Rubin notes that these major project delays and increasingly rapid depletion will result in a supply increase of only about three million barrels a day by 2012 – far below the 10 million barrels projected by the International Energy Agency. With oil demand soaring in places like China, India, Russia and in the world’s largest oil-producing countries themselves, a widening demand-supply gap will push crude oil prices to as high as US$150 a barrel by 2012.

“Soaring rates of car ownership in countries like Russia and China have boosted fuel demand in both countries,” says Mr. Rubin. “For example, gasoline, a key driver of rising oil use, is growing at over six per cent in both countries. But an even more important factor has been massive price subsidization in OPEC countries which has spurred extraordinary near-double-digit growth in oil demand.

“Not only is there virtually no price elasticity between OPEC’s own oil consumption and world oil prices but paradoxically, domestic consumption of oil in those countries may actually increase with rising world oil prices because higher crude prices boost incomes, which in turn, further boosts demand for massively subsidized domestic gasoline.”

The result of this unchecked soaring demand in most oil-producing nations means they will not be able to add any additional exports to meet the surging demand in developing countries.  Since crude demand in countries like China and India is far more income-elastic than price-elastic, these countries are likely to outbid OECD markets for increasingly scarce global supply.

The OECD, the largest global oil market today, is much more price sensitive and oil consumption, which has already fallen over the last two years, will decline by almost four million barrels per day over the next five years in response to steadily rising prices.

In the U.S. alone, with soaring crude prices pushing the cost of gasoline to US$4.50 a gallon, Mr. Rubin expects American demand for oil to drop by 10 per cent or nearly two million barrels a day by 2012.

 

 

Lunn misled Parliament, says NDP

NDP Catherine Bell, her party’s natural resources critic, tells me this morning that, after reviewing the Auditor General’s special examination of AECL,  Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn misled Parliament about the whole fiasco involving the shutdown of the Chalk River Nuclear Laboratory.

Her party, like others, is calling for Lunn’s resignation.

And, though Parliament is not set to resume its work until the end of the month, the opposition members of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Natural Resources hopes to convene a meeting of that committee next Tuesday in Ottawa and it wants Lunn to appear before that committee. Bell, though, recognizing that the AG report identifies problems at AECL occurred on the watch of the previous Liberal government as well as the current Conservative government, hopes to force the Natural Resources Committee to be as broad as possible in its probe of AECL’s failings.

Meanwhile, Lunn’s office tells me this morning that the Minister’s reaction to the AG’s special examination was to order a broad review of the corporate structure of AECL, which he did on Nov. 29. Lunn’s spokesperson also disputed the suggestion that the release of the AG’s audit was force by Liberal pressure on AECL. The spokesperson said AECL’s new board of directors met for the first time yesterday afternoon since the audit was delivered to AECL. The board wanted to review the audit before it was posted on its Web site.

 

Lunn knew in September about AECL deficiencies

In December, Liberal MP Omar Alghabra asked the Auditor General to audit Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd.

Today, the Liberals released a response from Fraser to Alghabra's letter. Fraser said her office just audited AECL and presented AECL's board with that audit on Sept 5 2007. She said AECL was under no legal obligation to disclose that audit but most Crown Corporations were expected to disclose it. She was mystified as to why AECL had not yet disclosed or published the audit.

As of 6 pm Wednesday AECL had not yet posted that audit and had not responded to calls I made today to AECL to see this audit.

Then, around 7 pm, the Liberals discovered that AECL had quietly posted the audit on its Web site.

The bottom line from the audit: Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn knew in September that Chalk River was a mess, requiring hundreds of millions of dollars to address public safety and security deficiencies.

Here's the key line from the cover page of that audit:

“We would like to draw your attention to a significant deficiency related to the unresolved strategic challenges that the Corporation faces … it is our view that this report contains information that should be brought to the attention of the Minister of Natural Resources. Accordingly, following consultation with the Board, we will be forwarding a copy of the report to the Minister.”

Again: That was presented to AECL's board on September 5.

Some quotes from the audit:

“We did not do a technical assessment of the safety and security of the Corporation’s nuclear research facilities or waste management practices, as they are monitored by the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.”

But, the auditor did have this to say:

“Our examination found a significant deficiency with respect to the risk that the Corporation may be unable to resolve three strategic challenges that, in particular, entail long-term funding requirements and that together would impair its ability to achieve its mandate. These challenges are the completion and licensing of the Dedicated Isotope Facility (DIF), the development and licensability of the Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR) in time for the market requirement, and the replacement of aging facilities at Chalk River Laboratories (CRL)”

“30. A significant deficiency is one that prevents, or puts at material risk, the organization’s ability to achieve one or more of its statutory control objectives—to safeguard and control its assets, to manage its resources economically and efficiently, and to carry out its operations effectively—in support of its mandate. 31. During our special examination, we noted a significant deficiency: the risk to AECL’s ability to achieve its mandate due to unresolved strategic challenges that, in particular, entail long-term funding requirements. These challenges are the completion and licensing of the Dedicated Isotope Facility (DIF), the development and licensability of the Advanced CANDU Reactor (ACR) in time for the market requirement, and the replacement of aging facilities at Chalk River Laboratories (CRL).” (p. 12)

38. Replacement of aging facilities at Chalk River Laboratories. Limited funds threaten AECL’s ability to manage the Canadian nuclear platform responsively and cost-effectively and to properly safeguard its assets. Some of the building infrastructure at the Chalk River Laboratories (CRL) is 50 to 60 years old, well past the end of its originally intended useful life. In our 2002 special examination, we reported that until AECL could resolve how to fund the replacement of the aging buildings, the risks to public safety were likely to increase. 39. AECL has made limited investments in its infrastructure in recent years. Over the last five years, it obtained a total of $34 million in incremental funding from the federal government to deal with urgent heath, safety, security, and environmental requirements at the Chalk River site.

40. AECL has identified a need to increase its operating and capital investment by some $600 million in the next 5 years (about $850 million in the next 10 years) to address fire and building code deficiencies as well as licensing, health, safety, and security issues at the Chalk River Laboratories site. We understand that these amounts will not be included in AECL’s operating and capital budgets until the government provides direction on future funding.

Chinese steel barred from Canada but Russia and South Africa now OK

The Canadian International Trade Tribunal today said that it will continue to try to prevent Chinese-made steel from coming into the Canadian market. The CITT believes impose anti-dumping duties on steel made in China are still required to protect Canadian industry.

Canadian steelmakers will, however, now have to compete against steel manufactured in Russia and in South Africa. The CITT lifted anti-dumping duties it had previously imposed on steel from those countries.

Mind you, we don’t exactly have a lot of Canadian steelmakers these days. Stelco, Dofasco, Ipsco and Algoma Steel have all been acquired by foreign steel makers since Stelco first complained about the Chinese and the Russians back in 1987.

 

 

Boeing's in-flight Internet service makes regulator nervous

The Federal Aviation Administration has asked The Boeing Co. to provide it with some proof that evil hackers on board a new giant 787 won’t be able to somehow take over the plane’s electronics.

The 787, which can carry 381 people (left), will be set up in such a way that passengers ought to be able to connect to the Web while they’re flying. Kinda cool, when you think about it, but the FAA is worried that “Because of this new passenger connectivity, the proposed data network design and integration may result in security vulnerabilities from intentional or unintentional corruption of data and systems critical to the safety and maintenance of the airplane.”

Existing safety regulations which the FAA normally enforces are not set up for a world where we can check e-mail and Facebook from 40,000 feet and so it has asked Boeing to show that “security, integrity, and availability of the aircraft systems and data networks are not compromised by certain wired or wireless electronic connections between airplane data buses and networks.”

Dear Prime Minister: Please send help!

On Friday, Prime Minister Harper will host the provincial premiers and territorial first ministers at 24 Sussex Drive. The economy is right at the top of the agenda. Here’s a letter from Jay Myers, an economist who is also the chief executive of Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters, a trade association which represents the country’s, er, manufacturers and exporters. Jay’s group is a relatively influential one and he has some thoughts about how governments can help business in Canada:

January 9th, 2008

Dear Prime Minister and Premiers,

When you meet on Friday to discuss Canada’s economic prospects in light of the recent surge in the Canadian dollar, you will have the opportunity to set the course for policy reforms needed to ensure the long-term competitiveness and prosperity of the entire Canadian economy.

Urgent action is needed in support of those industries at the cutting edge of international competition and innovation, but which are nevertheless bearing the brunt of currency appreciation, Canada’s manufacturing and exporting sectors.  At the same time, the policy reforms necessary to enable these industries to respond to the challenges of currency appreciation are the very initiatives required to sustain long-term economic growth and prosperity in a highly competitive global economy.

Today, our customers and our competitors are located around the world.  The competition for investment, for market share, and for knowledge, technology, and skilled workers, is intense.  But, Canadians have remarkable assets working in our favour – the richness of our natural resources, a highly educated and highly skilled workforce, our knowledge base, a highly productive business sector, and our well developed logistics, services, and knowledge infrastructure.  Our future economic prosperity rests on our ability to grow those assets, to create greater value from them, and to take advantage of new business opportunities both within Canada and around the world.

Manufacturers and exporters are the businesses that convert our country’s natural resources, and the knowledge and skills of Canadians into higher-value products and services tradable in global markets.  They are Canada’s innovative businesses.  But, many are now struggling to respond to the short-term challenges of dollar appreciation, rapidly rising business costs, and increasing low-cost competition from other countries.

In order to survive in the short-term and to grow and prosper in the future, Canada’s manufacturers and exporters must innovate.  They must become more specialized, customized, efficient, and fast.  They need to invest in new technologies, new products and services, new markets, as well as in upgrading the knowledge, skills, and expertise of their workforce.  If those investments are to be made in Canada, they require a predictable and internationally competitive tax and regulatory environment, reliable and cost-competitive infrastructure, secure and efficient access to domestic and international markets, and a highly productive and cost-efficient services sector.

We recognize that the onus is on each and every business to compete and win.  But, governments also have a critical role to play in ensuring a business environment that enables Canadian industry to retain and attract investment, and make the crucial improvements they require to remain competitive and grow in global markets.

We acknowledge the initiatives that your governments have already taken at both federal and provincial levels to reduce business taxes, streamline regulations, eliminate inter-provincial barriers to trade, and support investments in infrastructure, innovation, skills development, and new technologies.

But, more concerted action is now required in order to meet the unprecedented challenges of dollar appreciation, escalating energy costs, a weakening US economy, and fierce global competition.

We urge you on Friday to commit to working together in order to achieve the following seven objectives on an urgent basis:

  1. Build the most attractive tax environment in the world for business investment in productive assets, innovation, and skills development.  Policy reforms required to do this include:
    • Extension of the two-year write-off for investments in manufacturing and processing machinery and equipment for at least another five years; 
    • Improvements in the Scientific Research and Experimental Development tax credit system to make the credits refundable and reduce administrative uncertainties;
    • Extension of tax loss carry-back provisions from three to seven years;
    • Introduction of an Employers’ Training Tax Credit, creditable against Employment Insurance premiums;
    • Immediate elimination of provincial capital taxes;
    • Transformation of provincial sales taxes into a value-added tax structure; and
    • The reduction of Canada’s combined federal and provincial corporate tax rate to 22% by 2012.
  2. Coordinate efforts in support of encouraging business investment in new production facilities, technologies, and innovation initiatives.  Federal as well as provincial investments are necessary if Canada is to compete with other industrial economies in securing business investment, product mandates, and industrial innovation activity. 
  3. Harmonize and coordinate regulations to eliminate unnecessary differences, streamline regulatory requirements, and reduce compliance costs.  Your governments should take every opportunity to create a competitive regulatory environment in Canada by simplifying regulations, building enabling regulatory frameworks for new technologies, reducing the cost of regulatory compliance, eliminating duplication and inconsistencies in regulatory requirements, and eliminating regulatory restrictions on trade and labour mobility across Canada.  Clear timetables for regulatory reviews should be established in order to provide greater certainty for investment.  Furthermore, we recommend the establishment of a Canadian Competitiveness Commission, based on the Australian model, which would assess federal and provincial regulatory initiatives with respect to their impacts on economic competitiveness.
  4. Expedite and coordinate investments in border, security, and transportation infrastructure based on a national logistics strategy aimed at ensuring the efficient flow of goods between Canada and our largest trading partner, the United States, while making Canada the preferred logistics hub for trade between North America and the rest of the world.
  5. Respond to the skills shortages that Canadian businesses are facing by jointly encouraging closer collaboration between industry and our universities and colleges with respect to both research and education, speeding up entry procedures for temporary foreign skilled workers, and helping Canadian workers enter productive employment in labour markets across the country.
  6. Ensure that federal and provincial investments in innovation, education, workforce development, and public infrastructure generate the greatest possible economic benefits for Canadians.  Government procurement should aim to leverage business opportunities and encourage innovation on the part of Canadian industry.  Your governments would simply be following the lead of every other industrialized country in this regard.
  7. Make the investments and expedite the regulatory processes required to ensure that Canadian industry has access to reliable and cost competitive energy supplies now and in the future.

These measures will significantly enhance the business environment for manufacturers, as well as for other business sectors, across Canada.  They will encourage the growth of value-adding businesses and enable companies to make the changes they require to co
mpete and win in global markets with our currency trading at or above par with the US dollar.  All Canadians will benefit because their prosperity and employment opportunities depend on both the competitiveness and growth prospects of Canada’s manufacturing and exporting sectors. 

We aim to maintain a world-class manufacturing and exporting sector in Canada that will enable Canadians to continue to enjoy strong economic growth and high-value, high-paying jobs.  We trust that you share that same vision and recognize that a strong and competitive manufacturing and exporting base is an integral part of Canada’s economic future.

Sincerely,

Jayson Myers                                                               

President                                                                     

Canadian Manufacturers & Exporters   

Where is AECL's audit?

Last December, Liberal MP Omar Alghabra, his party’s Natural Resources Critic, wrote to Auditor General Sheila Fraser to ask her to do a special examination of Atomic Energy of Canada Ltd. (AECL), a Crown corporation. Fraser wrote back to tell Alghabra that, under federal law, crown corporations are subject to a special examination at least once every five years and that she had just completed such an examination of AECL.

Fraser said she presented her report to the board of AECL on Sept. 5, 2007.

She went on to say, “Although there is no statutory requirement that federal Crown corporations make special examination reports public, there is an expectation that they do so … To the best of our knowledge, AECL has yet to release its special examination report…”

  UPDATE: Well, look at that! A few
hours after Stephane Dion brought up the absence of the AG Audit of
AECL at a nationally televised news conference, AECL has posted
the audit on its Web site.