Back-to-school; counting stimulus signs; and jail guards threatened: Tuesday's A1 headlines and political daybook

beatdown.jpgBack-to-school; counting stimulus signs; and jail guards threatened: Get a four-minute audio summary of what's on Tuesday's front pages of papers across the country by clicking on the link below.

Listen!

You can also get these audio summaries automatically every day via podcast from iTunes or via an RSS feed by subscribing to my AudioBoo stream. Both the iTunes link and the RSS link are at my profile at AudioBoo.fm. Look in the top right corner of the “Boos” box.

SunTV: We're looking for six bucks a year — a year! — but only if you want to pay

Over at my Facebook page, a friend asks me: “David, what are your thoughts re the so-called “Fox News North” broadcast application to the CRTC?”

As I'm the National Bureau Chief for the applicant and will likely have a prominent role in the television programming for the station once it gets up and running, I was pleased to provide the following reply:

First: It's called SunTV News. It's 100 per cent Canadian owned and operated. There's no deal with FOX; no licensing; no money from FOX. We're as Canadian as the CBC. SunTV News. Not Fox News North.

Second: Take a look at the CRTC's “Notice of Hearing” for our licence. It's a short read and it's right here at:

http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2010/2010-649.htm

Let me cut to the chase and sum up what's in that doc: We are not asking taxpayers to subsidize us. We're not asking the CRTC to force Canadians to pay for our programming or to be forced to watch us. What we are doing is asking the CRTC to order Rogers, Shaw, Videotron, Telus, Bell and all other cable and satellite companies to put us on the digital dial so that, to quote from the CRTC notice, “the public [can] have access to Sun TV News without any obligation to choose it.”

So to sum up: You don't want it? No problem. We're not asking the CRTC to force you to pay for it. You want it? Terrific. We are asking the CRTC to make sure your local television provider puts it on the dial so that you can order it.

Our owners, Quebecor Inc., plan on losing about $25 million over the first four years of Sun TV's operation. That's $25 million that a Canadian company is willing to bet on Canadian journalists and Canadian audiences. When was the last time that happened? (Why it was Conrad Black's National Post where I just happened to be a proud day oner!)

How will SunTV make money? Partly through the sale of advertising. But we're also betting that a lot of Canadians will pay 50 cents a month for us. That's right. $6 a year. A year.

Of that 50 cents, half will go to us and half to the TV distributor. So we're going through these hoops so we can ask you — not force you — to give us $3 a year. For that, we intend to offer you some television news programming that you can't get on CTV or CBC (or American-owned CNN, for that matter, the channel that is easily the most-watched all-news channel in this country.)

You can read all about what we're up to by downloading this collection of documents (including revenue and expense estimates) which Quebecor has filed with the CRTC:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/public/broad/applications/2010/2010-1188-2.zip

Annals of Re-branding: From "Canada's New Government" to "Harper Government"

Have you noticed this over the summer? The federal government, in its press releases, is 're-branding' itself. With increasing frequency, it's no longer the “Government of Canada”, it's now the “Harper government” as in:

You'll recall that in its first days, back in 2006, the Harper government decreed that the “Government of Canada” be referred to as “Canada's New Government” in its press releases, a phrase that continued to be in use nearly two years after “Canada's New Government” was installed in January, 2006::

Not sure why we're back to this re-branding exercise at this point (Calls are in to the appropriate individuals) but, given the fact that we're likely within 6 months of the next general election call and given the fact that the Conservative franchise, at this point, lives or dies with its leader, Stephen Harper, I wonder if this is a slightly insidious way of using government press releases to remind voters who's behind the 'good news' in each release.

Coloured tents and the case for liberalism in Canada

Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff held a press conference today (pictured at the right with Cape Breton MP Mark Eyking) as he closed out the Liberal 2010 summer caucus meeting here in Baddeck, N.S.

ClosingIggy.jpg

Now, the Liberals have lost nearly 100 seats since 2000 and have had declining returns at the polls for a decade now. I asked Ignatieff if this was perhaps evidence that Canadians are increasingly comfortable away from the political centre, that, to borrow the metaphor the Liberals have used all week, they are happy in their orange tent, or the blue tent or, in Quebec, their light-blue tent. Is liberalism on the decline in Canada?

Here is Ignatieff's response:

“What I notice is Canadians are tired of a politics of division, a politics of wedges. A politics in which the government says, let’s divide urban and rural Canada on the gun registry. Isn’t that a clever thing to do. In fact, the blue tent is a narrow tent, right? All the other tents are narrow, small tents and what Canadians are looking for is a big tent – I hope it’s a red one – that pulls Canadian regions together, that pulls Canadian people together that says, what can we do together? And that’s the appeal.

“I’m not a hyperpartisan politician. There’s a lot of Progressive Conservatives who are walking around saying I’ve got no home here. I’ve got no room in that narrow dark-blue tent of Mr. Harper. I don’t recognize myself in the values of that party. I’ve got people on the other side coming to our meetings, Greens and NDP saying I just can’t stand another four years of Mr. Harper inaction on the environment. So this is why that big red tent appeals to Canadians. That’s the tent I’m trying to re-build. I’ve got a lot of work to do. I did a 142 events, I must have given more than a 100 speeches. I’m going to be doing ‘Open Mike’ meetings all autumn to get the message out because I passionately believe – and I believe since I was 17 years old – that the big red tent is good for Canada, that the tings that we love about Canada – the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Canada Pension Plan, medicare, that basic sense of equality of opportunity, no region left behind, no gaps between urban and rural Canada – all those things have been incarnated best by those great people who put up the big red tent and they include Mike Pearson, Pierre Trudeau, everybody. That’s why I’m here. I grew up under that big red tent and I want the whole country to shelter under it again.”

Well then, I continued, last year you were very aggressive with the “Mr. Harper, your time is up” and there certainly were a number of Canadians who said, “Great! Cuz I don’t like that guy Harper and go get ‘em.” And they might have disappointed that you didn’t go to the polls and they may look again that you’ve been talking a bad game about Mr. Harper, why don’t you tell us that you’re going to take him to the polls again this fall?

“You’ve got to this step by step. Trust is earned. People’ve got to shake your hand. You got to talk to them, you got to listen. I think I shook, 11, 12 13 thousand hands this summer. That’s a lot of hands. But when you put that in a population of 35 million people, it’s not so many people. I’ve got a lot of work to do. People come over slowly. People need to be persuaded. People need to feel they’ve got a leader here who wants to lisent who wants to learn, who wants to understand the country in all its complexity and bring Canadians together. It’s not the work of a single day. It’s work that takes time. But I’m absolutely convinced in my heart or hearts, we get into an election whenever it comes and there’s a choice between a broad inclusive compassionate alternative on one side and this narrow low-ceiling alternative on the other, the politics of meanness, the politics of division, Canadians will choose by a large majority to come back into the red tent. But I’ve got to prove it. I’ve got to work it. I’ve got to earn it.

Breitkreuz and Angus trade e-mails: Tories vs NDP on the gun registry

Before Conservative MP Candice Hoeppner and her private member's bill to kill the long-gun registry, there was Saskatchewan Conservative MP Garry Breitkreuz and his private member's bill to kill the registry. Breitkreuz eventually allowed his bill to die so Hoeppner could pick it up. But Breitkreuz is still working to kill the registry. Here's a note he's sending to those NDP MPs that appear ready to vote with the Tories to kill the registry. NDP MP Charlie Angus, who is one of those NDPers who opposes the registry, writes back just below:

From: Breitkreuz, Garry – M.P.

To: Angus, Charlie – Personal

Sent: Tue Aug 31 11:43:59 2010

Subject: Please consider …

I thought you might like to see a recent opinion piece I was asked to write for The Mark website.

I can appreciate that the NDP M.P.s who supported Bill C-391 are now under tremendous pressure to flip-flop by supporting the motion to kill the bill on September 22. This is just a short note to remind you that nothing has changed since you supported Bill C-391 on November 4, 2009. The vast majority of your constituents asked you to help scrap the long-gun registry then, and they have not changed their minds. If anything, they are even more resolute and growing in numbers today.

In light of the Liberal leader’s decision to whip his caucus into killing Bill C-301 on September 22, your voice is even more important. A Canadian Press/Harris Decima poll shows that the majority of NDP supporters favour scrapping the registry – you will be representing them with pride when you vote against the motion on September 22.

Regards,

Garry Breitkreuz
Yorkton-Melville

Here's the reply Charlie Angus sent back to Breitkreuz:

From: Angus, Charlie – Personal
Sent: August 31, 2010 2:48 PM
To: Breitkreuz, Garry – M.P.
Subject: Re: Please consider …
Dear Garry,

Thanks for taking the time to personally email me.

I was more than a little surprised to hear from you about the registry, again. It’s interesting that this is the only rural issue you ever seem to want to talk to us about. You and your government have hardly been collegial with rural New Democrats on addressing the concerns of our citizens.

No matter. I supported getting Bill C-391 to committee because I felt rural Canadians had legitimate concerns about the costs of the registry, its effectiveness and whether or not it is used effectively by police. I was really hoping we could all work together as Parliamentarians, listen to the problems with the registry, hear from various witnesses and finally get answers to these fundamental questions.

Unfortunately, your government has fought against information getting out, actively suppressed departmental reports and publically attacked police officers who dare disagree with you.

But I do appreciate your letter. Thanks to your opinion piece, I learned that the Harper government believes the real reason police are “strident” on this issue is because they “don’t want Canadians to own guns”. And you seem to claim the real reason police want to keep the registry is not for public safety, but so they someday will be able to burst into family homes and seize grampa's 20 gauge.
Sorry Gary, but that's just crazy talk about our police.

I’m not sure how it is in your city, but where I come from folks don't see their police as a threat. They trust the police – the men and women who put their lives on the line every day to keep the rest of us safe. Your extreme attitudes and wild claims just don’t reflect what Canadians are like.

We all remember your last attempt to bring in gun legislation, when you tried to slip in new regulations that would make it a-okay to carry restricted firearms like hand guns and semi-automatic assault weapons in cars in cities. That one just didn't pass the smell test, did it?

So Gary, let's be frank: we're just not on the same page here at all. Rural New Democrats have brought forward legitimate concerns of rural residents and are looking to have those issues addressed. The Harper Conservatives, on the other hand, would rather try and just stir up rural Canadians with all manner of wild and crazy conspiracy theories about our local police forces. And just for the sake of a quick fundraising buck and some negative partisan advertising.

Thanks for the advice, but no thanks.

Best,

Charlie


The Twitter fistfight: Liberals vs NDP over the gun registry

For the last two days here in Baddeck, N.S. where the Liberals are holding their 2010 summer caucus retreat, Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff has hammered Jack Layton and the NDP over their position on the long-gun registry, going so far as to say that NDP stands for “No Darn Principles”. NDP hill staffers and some MPs immediately launched an all-out attack on Twitter at the Liberals.

Here's the play-by-play on Twitter (with explanations of Twitter terms below):

After Ignatieff's speech on Monday

Adam Goldenberg (Ignatieff speech-writer, tweets as @adamgoldenberg: On #gunregistry: #NDP has to “stand up, or they've got No Darn Principle.” – @M_Ignatieff

Marc-Andre Viau (NDP caucus press secretary tweets as @maviau) Maternal health, pay equity, enviro assessment.. RT @davidakin Fightin' words: @M_Ignatieff says #NDP stands for No Darn Principles

James Valcke (Researcher, NDP Caucus Services tweets as @ValckeNDP) : AECL privitization, Anti-scab, climate change @davidakin Fightin' words: @M_Ignatieff says #NDP stands for No Darn Principles

George Soule (NDP caucus press secretary, tweets as @G_Soule) : out of #afgh, tar sands, torture, pro-choice… RT @davidakin Fightin' words: @M_Ignatieff says #NDP stands for No Darn Principles

Valcke: @M_Ignatieff and #lpc now simply telling bold face untruths about their history of support Harper conservatives.

Drew Anderson (communications for NDP HQ elections team tweets as @DrewA_NDP🙂 @M_Ignatieff 's principles: “The United Nations is a messy, wasteful, log-rolling organization.”

Anderson: @M_Ignatieff 's principles: “We need to make sure that assassinations don't do more harm than good. “

Valcke: Sponsorship scandal, Kyoto failure, corp tax cuts RT @davidakin Fightin' words: @M_Ignatieff: #NDP stands for No Darn Principles

Soulex2_2873f59.jpg : Fear not. I'm sure many flip flops to come. RT @alisoncrawford5 Last bbq flip of the #lpcx [Crawford, a CBC Radio reporter, had posted the picture at right)

Valcke: “No Darn Principles” comment by @M_Ignatieff was almost as offensive as their feigned patronage outrage last week.

Oliva Chow (NDP MP tweets as @OliviaChow): #LPC united and principled? What about on abortion rights, Afghan war and the 120 votes in support of #CPC in #HoC?

Michelle Simson (Liberal MP tweets as @michellesimson): O Jack, just watching ur news conf on CPAC re party's stance on the gun registry. Talk 2 the hand. U're not building a bridge, ur blowing 1.

Soule: Still vexed by an #lpc leader who voted over 100 times with the Harper #cpc, pointing the finger at others for lack of principles.

Anderson: “Nothing is personal in politics because politics is theatre.” @M_Ignatieff 's principles.

Valcke: Bahahahahaha #youkillme RT @RupNDP: Liberals' “big red tent” is more like a “big circus show”

Brad Lavigne (National Director of the NDP, tweets as @bradlavigne): For the record, if the Liberals want to run the next campaign on a contest of principles, we're kinda ok with that.

Goldenbergolcf.jpg : Missing: @JackLayton's credibility. If found, please call – [Goldenberg tweets a link to the picture at left]

Goldenberg: Jack Layton helped Stephen Harper scrap childcare & Kelowna Accord. Now he's helping him scrap the #gunregistry. What's next?

Viau: AK47 are illegal. Get your pic right.

Valcke: @adamgoldenberg “I commit to you that I will call a general election within 30 days of the commission's final report and recommendations.” And then the people of Canada will have their say. (Address to the nation) CBC, April 21 2005 Paul Martin

Valcke: @adamgoldenberg maybe you missed that though. I'll give you a mulligan.

Goldenberg: Check your dates, @ValckeNDP. The final report was released 2 months after Jack Layton voted down the Martin government, dooming childcare.

Viau: Good reading for the #Libs. Principled Liberals/un-principled New Democrats? It is to laugh. http://tinyurl.com/37xccnt #ludicrous

After Ignatieff's speech on Tuesday

Goldenberg: “You can side with the police on the #gunregistry or you can side with Mr. Harper. Make up your mind, Jack.” – @M_Ignatieff

Lavigne: The #ndp need to decide? Really? #lpc has voted with Harper 100+ times on confidence matters. #payequity #war #nukes #alittlerich

Viau Make up your mind like Harper your time is up? RT @davidakin Iggy to NDP on #gunregistry: Make up your mind, Jack. The hour is getting late.

Viau #Iffy wants to amend the long gun registry, then doesn't want to. #flipflop #makeupyourmind

Soule: On registry: Ignatieff doesn't get it: building bridges btwn rural&urban Cnda is what Cndn principled leadership is about.

Goldenberg: @G_Soule Fact: You can either improve #gunregistry (#LPC's plan) or scrap it (Harper's plan). You can't scrap it, then improve it.

Valcke: Brinsksmanship politics. Way to keep the issues of the nation clear as mud.

Soule: @adamgoldenberg wrong. You can fix it. (#ndp proposal) or do nothing except MT promises despite 9 yrs in maj. gov't with it. (#lpc reality)

Valcke: Canadians send MPs to Ottawa to represent them and find solutions. Jack Layton has been building bridges since he arrived here.

Ben Parsons, (Researcher, Liberal Research Bureau tweets as @parsob): It is clear to me that a certain segment of the NDP caucus has lost confidence in Jack Laytons leadership.

Goldenberg: Simple Q for #NDP staffers @ValckeNDP & @G_Soule: How does @JackLayton plan to improve the #gunregistry after scrapping it?

Valcke: Wasn't it just a few months ago the Libs had a problem with votes on thier own motion? 3 Lib MPs opposed their leader in the House?

Soule: @adamgoldenberg No secret, we're both staff. Not complicated. We fix it by showing leadership, getting support in #hoc to not scrap it.

Goldenberg: So… those 12 #NDP MPs will vote *against* C-391?

Goldenberg We need 12 #NDP votes to #savethegunregistry. Lend us your votes, @JackLayton.

Lavigne: #lpc has lost almost every rural seat it held in 2000. Today it announced it is writing-off what is left

Goldenberg @bradlavigne Gun control = “writing-off” rural Canada? Sounds like “the stereotype that rural priorities begin & end w/ guns.”

Anderson: Buyer beware! Don't take your #bigredtent out in the rain. Apparently they'll shrink 97 seats in 10 years.

Twitter terms used above:

#AFGH – Afghanistan

#HOC – House of Commons

#IFFY – Perjorative nickname for Michael Ignatieff

@[NAME] – Used to denote that a tweet is “at” or in reference to something some other Twitter user said.

#LPC – Liberal Party of Canada

#LPCX – Liberal Party Express – Ignatieff's cross-summer tour

#NDP – New Democratic Party

RT – Re-tweet. When you see something on twitter that you want to pass along or comment upon, you can “re-tweet” it so the next person reading it can see it. Authorship generally belongs to the @[NAME] that immediately follows the RT.

Liberals on defence? Offence? Depends how you count it.

Today in many of our papers, I argued that Michael Ignatieff's summer tour was all about defence, that it was not necessarily about winning votes as it was about finding Liberals who would be ready to volunteer, donate money, and fight for Ignatieff and the party in the next general election. I came to this conclusion after talking to Liberals in Ottawa and in some of the regions Ignatieff visited and after examining the 45-day itinerary.

You can read the column here.

I probably should also have been more explicit in nothing that there is nothing wrong with playing defence and that, in fact, the “defensive” politics of finding your own supporters and re-engaging them seems to me to be a crucial first step before finding independent or uncommitted voters.

Nonetheless, I think some Liberals may have thought I was being critical of the idea of the tour — which I was not: It was smart politics — or that I was advancing the thesis that it stuck to safe ridings where Ignatieff would have an easy ride. I wasn't doing that, either, but, nonetheless, the Liberals have helpfully put together some riding-by-riding data on the tour for anyone who might come to that conclusion:

19 Bloc Quebecois ridings (18% of stops and the BQ hold 16% of House of Commons seats);

50 Conservative ridings (48% of stops, hold 47% of seats);

26 Liberal ridings (25% of stops, hold 25% of seats)

10 NDP ridings (10% of stops, hold 12% of seats);

Overall the Liberal Express tour visited 105 ridings. Of those, 79 or 75 per cent were non-Liberal ridings and 75% of the seats in the House of Commons are not held by Liberals.

While I have the provinces and cities the tour touched down in, I don't have the actual ridings, I will say this: Many of the non-Liberal ridings Ignatieff visited were, as I said in the column, placed like Peterborough, Ont., Kitchener, Ont. or (later this month) Thunder Bay, Ont. — all cities that were Liberal as recently as the 2004 election in Peterborough's case and or 2006 in the case of Kitchener and Thunder Bay. So those would “non-Liberal” ridings right now but were Liberal ridings within the last two or three general elections and are the natural places to look for Liberals if they hope to win enough seats again to form the government. In other words, it looks to me like the tour emphasized areas of the country where Liberals had some electoral success recently and the party and leader need to “re-activate”, if you will, the local grassroots.

Iggy to Harper: "We make the rules!"

If you haven't yet done so, check out this video I shot last Thursday at the airport in Tuktoyaktuk, NWT while on tour with Prime Minister Stephen Harper:

It's that last line of Harper's that has put a big smile on the face of those in Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff's office — the “I think I make the rules” line. Ignatieff, in a stump speech in Elmsdale, Nova Scotia this morning, jumped on that line.

“Of course he meant it as a joke but I don't think it was entirely a joke. That told you — that took you right inside the head of Stephen Harper. That told you what's inside. 'I make the rules.' Well, unless I'm seriously mistaken, we make the rules! The people of Canada make the rules! We want a prime minister and team that respects the rules, that respects the Canadian people, that listen to the Canadian people, especially when the Canadian people have something to say that we might not necessarily want to hear.”

If you've got a minute-and-a-half, give the whole thing a listen as Iggy shows a bit of passion trying to connect the “I make the rules” comment to the census decision.

Listen!

In Nova Scotia, on board the Liberal Express with Michael Ignatieff

lpcx.jpg

While many of my Sun Media colleagues have had the chance this summer to enjoy the hospitality aboard the Liberal Express, I have not — until today. I'm picking up Michael Ignatieff's summer tour on its last days, as it travels from Halifax to Cape Breton and the end-of-summer national Liberal caucus in Baddeck, N.S.

The tour today stops in Elmsdale at 0900, Masstown at 1100, Antigonish at 1330 and Big Pond at 1700.

I and other reporters then head to Baddeck this evening while Ignatieff and the bus overnight in Sydney. Ignatieff will then arrive Monday in Baddeck to begin the caucus.

The bus ride today is full of Liberal candidates, MPs, and Senators including:

  • MPs Scott Brison, Maria Minna, Geoff Regan, and Rodger Cuzner
  • Senators James Cowan, Terry Mercer, Wilfred Moore