I know there's many more important things in the world but I wonder if any of you might have some insight into this particular problem:
In November, I travelled to the Heritage Canada building in Gatineau, Quebec and parked my car at a meter on the street outside the building. After parking, I discovered that electronic meter was flashing. It was out of order, a sign most motorists believe means — parking is free today.
I headed in for my appointment but upon returning, I had received a ticket for parking at an expired meter. Who knows when the meter returned to service but it was working upon my return and was apparently working when the meter maid came by.
On the ticket, I checked off the"Not Guilty" box and asked for a trial.
Recently, I got the trial notice in the mai and, to my surprise, the ticket that I could have paid "early" had I pled guilty in September for about $20 now comes with substantial risk. If I want to change my plea now, I will have to pay $57 to get off the hook. If continue, go to trial, and lose, I'll be hit with a $117 charge. Sure would have been nice to know how the fine was going to escalate when I first pled guilty but now it seems, in for a penny, in for a pound …
So here's the question for legal beagles or anyone out there with any experience on this:
Is it a sufficient defence to tell the judge that I was present and prepared to deposit a fee in the meter for time in the parking spot but the meter was defective and would not accept my payment?
Tags: parking tickets, quebec