Canada's best-selling cars for August

Automotive analyst Dennis Desrosiers published his sales-by-vehicle breakdown this afternoon for August. As Desrosiers notes, sales of small, fuel-efficient cars — though they are among the top sellers — are all off compared to August of last year. And, as a group, small cars are underperforming the already underperforming automative sales market.

What market segment is doing well? “Well the large/luxury segment is down only 7.0 percent year-to-date in a market that is down by 15.5 per cent,” Desrosiers said. “In August (the large/uxury) segment was up 14.8 per cent for the month while total sales were down by 7.9 percent. I guess those whose gots … gets.! “

Here's the top five lists for August, as compiled by Desrosiers Automotive Research:

Top 5 Cars (pct change in sales compared to last August):

  1. Honda Civic (-18.5 %)
  2. Toyota Corolla (-30.0 %)
  3. Mazda3 (-11.1 %)
  4. Hyundai Elantra (+235.2 %)
  5. Hyundai Accent (-6.9 %)

Among the Detroit 3 carmakers, Ford had two in the Top 10. The Ford Focus was number 6 and the Ford Fusion was number 9. General Motors placed one, the Pontiac Vibe, at number 10. Chrysler did not have one in the August top ten and neither Chrylsler nor GM had a vehicle in the top 10 sellers so far this year.

Top 5 Vans, SUVs, and Light Trucks

  1. Ford F-Series (+7.6 %)
  2. Chevrolet Silverado (+38.5 %)
  3. Dodge Caravan (+ 98.1 %)
  4. GMC Sierra (+38.1 %)
  5. Ford Escape (+2.8 %)

Toyota's RAV4, Hyundai's Santa Fe and the Honda CR-V hold down the 8,9, and 10 spots on this list.

Health Minister Aglukkaq responds to the body bags story

In response to this, Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq just issued the following:

WINNIPEG – Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq made the following statement following reports that several body bags had been delivered by Health Canada to a First Nations community in Manitoba:

“During a conference call with First Nations organizations yesterday morning it was brought to my attention that there were reports out of Manitoba that Health Canada had delivered body bags to a remote First Nation Community in that province as part of H1N1 preparations for the Fall.”

“What happened is unacceptable. It was insensitive and offensive. As Minister of Health and as an aboriginal I am offended. To all who took offence at what occurred, I want to say that I share your concern and I pledge to get to the bottom of it. I have ordered my Deputy Minister to conduct a thorough and immediate inquiry into the situation. I will make the result of the inquiry public. I will continue to work with First Nations communities and the provinces and territories to ensure all Canadians are informed and protected against H1N1.

“I was born and raised in remote communities and I understand the challenges better then anyone – that's why I have met frequently with First Nations organizations. Anyone suggesting that our Government's solution to H1N1 is body bags is sensationalizing this situation.

“There is strong co-operation taking place with First Nations people at the community, regional and national levels, as well as with provinces and territories, to ensure that all Canadians are informed of and protected from the H1N1flu virus. As Health Minister I am fully committed to these efforts.”

  

Harper's White House greeting an "unbelievable insult and snub": Beltway insider

[UPDATED – WITH PMO REACTION]

As Prime Minister Stephen Harper arrived at the White House this morning for a meeting with U.S. President Barack Obama, Canadian all-news networks were carrying the event live. On CTV News Channel, anchor Dan Matheson watched the incoming pictures with Mark Plotkin, the political commentator and analyst for WTOP Radio in Washington and a long-time Beltway insider. Here's my rough transcript of the conversation, as aired, between Plotkin and Matheson:

Matheson: Mr. Plotkin, I take it that it matters who greets you at the White House. I didn't see Barack Obama there as Stephen Harper was being ushered in.

Plotkin: I'm not being hyperbolic or inflammatory but I thought it was an unbelievable insult and snub. If you are – quote – important, the president comes out and greets you as you depart from the car and ushers you in.

I am supposed to know something about American politics, and believe me, I do not know who the woman was who greeted [your prime minister].

I tried to find out and I was told by the national security press advisor that supposedly that was the deputy chief of protocol, not the chief of protocol of the state department.

… I don't know if it was deliberate or accidental, but it surely was not a symbolic gesture of friendship and it was really, in my mind, demeaning.

Matheson: Does this go hand in glove with the way [UK Prime Minister] Gordon Brown was treated? At one time, the Brits were called the greatest friend America has in the world, and that was a couple years ago, and we, of course, are American's greatest trading partner. What's going on here? What do you make of this?

Plotkin: Well, what I think of it — I scoured the Washington Post which every – quote – opinion maker reads and there were two scintillas of mention – very, very brief about this visit.

One just said [Harper] was meeting with [Obama], and then there was some other passing reference that had nothing to do with the visit, but just with Canada, and how you're our good neighbor. You don't cause any trouble. You don't have drug wars that we know about. You don't plan to invade … and you're taken for granted. You're the neighbor who we can count on and we can rely on and is really our very nice neighbor but we really don't invite them in for holiday parties or when there are serious things. So this, to me, is a very pro forma visit. I must be fair, when it came to Gordon Brown, they did the same thing. I've been told here that Canadian reporters are getting one question [of Harper and Obama] and an American reporter is getting one question and that's it. If you are really significant, important, big, huge, you get something in the east room which is a joint press conference where the prime minister and the president would stand there with their flags and they would receive inquiries and questions. To call this downplayed visit is an overstatement.

… I don't want to be too extreme. I'm sure it's being taken seriously. We have the longest border with your country. You have been in Afghanistan [but] you're just some nice little thing, and in Washington, where every nuance is observed and commented upon you are, for all practical purposes — and I don't mean to be mean — invisible. You don't cause us any trouble. I would think that the president maybe would say something publicly about the gratitude he has for the sacrifices you've made in Afghanistan. We're on the eve of hearing that [the U.S. military] wants more troops. The president has sent 21,000 more troops. We have 86,000 people there.

In terms of the “Buy American” provision, which I know disturbs [Canada] quite a bit in the stimulus package, it seems to me that those issues are big enough and even if we didn't care about you, just the proximity of good manners would seem to me that you be included.

But this president, in many ways, although he's a classy guy, I think is not either advised or doesn't have the instinct to sometimes show some deference and Canada, on the world stage, to him is not that significant.

I don't think it's deliberate. I don't think it's willful. Maybe it's worse much he's just indifferent.

200909161541.jpgCommunications staff in the Prime Minister's Office have taken note of Plotkin's comments (and this blog — thanks!) and were very happy to point me at UK Prime Minister Brown's Flickr site for his spring visit to the U.S., where you will find the photo at left, which comes with this byline, supplied by the UK PMO: “Gordon Brown is welcomed to the West Wing of the White House by Acting US Chief of Protocol Gladys Boluda, 3 March 2009.”
Harper's staff were also pleased to call my attention to this quote from the Obama: “I want to again publicly thank Prime Minister Harper for being an outstanding partner to the United States. We appreciate his excellent work. We very much appreciate the Canadian people and we're looking forward to seeing them next week in both the United Nations context and the G20.”

Conference notice: Talking about access-to-information, public's right-to-know

200909151629.jpg

I was pleased to be invited to be a panelist for one of the sessions that will be part of the “Right To Know” conference, to be held Sept. 28-Oct. 1 and organized by the Office of the Information Commissioner of Canada.

It's all part of Right To Know Week across the country.

There's lots of great sessions for those interested in this important issue.

My session will be on Monday, Sept. 28 from 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. The conference will be held at the Canadian War Museum here in the nation's capital.

Suzanne Legault, the interim information commissioner, will make some opening remarks before my panel discussion which is centred on “Citizens' Engagement and State Accountability.” My good friends David McKie of CBC Radio and Jeff Sallot, now of Carleton University and formerly of The Globe and Mail, will also be on the panel. We'll be joined by Andy Kaplan-Myrth, a lawyer and VP of VisibleGovernment.ca, Ben Leapman, one of the journalists who contributed to the (UK) Daily Telegraph's terrific work on unearthing the outrageous expenses of British parliamentarians, Kerry Pither, a human rights and civil liberties advocate. Lucy van Oldenbarneveld, host of CBC News at Six in Ottawa, will be moderating the panel.

The conference is free! So please tell one and all about it.

Did Iggy and McGuinty make a deal on the HST?

Earlier today, word came from Queen's Park that, in a scrum with reporters, Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said that he and federal Liberal leader Michael Ignatieff had struck a deal that would see a future Liberal government honour the deal federal finance minister Jim Flaherty made with Ontario on the Harmonized Sales Tax, i.e. subsidize the implementation of that controversial tax to the tune of $4.3 billion.

The federal Tories immediately smelled blood. After all, Ignatieff is on record as being critical of what he called the “Harper Sales Tax.”

Dimitri Soudas, the chief spokesman for Prime Minister Stephen Harper, had this to say:

When you’re an opportunist like Michael Ignatieff, you think nothing of saying one thing in public, another in private.

This morning Premier Dalton McGuinty told reporters that he has received Michael Ignatieff’s backing for the harmonized sales tax. According to the Premier, “We have secured Mr. Ignatieff’s commitments to moving ahead with the single sales tax should he earn the privilege of serving Canadians in government.”

Ignatieff’s secret guarantee contradicts his public attack on harmonization. Ignatieff said (on Sept. 4): “The HST, the Harper sales tax, the thing that concerns us is that the Harper government has, during a time of recession and economic difficulty, basically pushed sales tax harmonization across the country …”

This isn’t a flip flop. His action is calculated and opportunistic. Ignatieff is deliberately saying one thing to Ontarians while cutting the opposite deal behind closed doors. More evidence that he’s not in it for Canadians. He’s in it for himself.

Then, after Question Period in Ottawa, Ignatieff's staff said that McGuinty had misspoken, that there was no deal and that McGuinty's office would be retracting the premier's statement. It's almost 5 p.m. and we have seen no such retraction and now there is some doubt as to whether there will be a retraction. In any event, Ignatieff did not speak to reporters today but here is my exchange with Liberal finance critic John McCallum after QP today in Ottawa:

Akin: Your leader has called the HST, “Harper's Sales Tax.” I hear there's news from McGuinty's office today about some deal but maybe there wasn't a deal? Can you give us your sense where does the federal Liberal Party stand on a harmonized sales tax?

McCallum: Well, first of all, it's my understanding that there was some miscommunication and that Mr. McGuinty's office is going to clarify that statement because there is no deal between our leader and the McGuinty government. Where we stand is that we will – that our principal point on this is that this was a Harper government initiative. The Harper government pushed the governments of both British Columbia and Ontario to implement this and that's why we call it a Harper sales tax. And the proof that they pushed it is that they have subsidized Ontario to the tune of $4.3 billion to help them implement the tax and we suspect they will do something similar in British Columbia.

Akin: Isn't the HST an effective way or an efficient way for governments to get revenue with the least distortions in the economy and that it's the kind of tax that a government ought to impose?

McCallum: Well, look, it's an initiative taken by the two provincial governments who are sovereign governments in conjunction with the Harper government. One can certainly debate whether the implementation of a tax of this kind in the middle of a recession is sound public policy. But as of now we are the opposition, not the government, and our position is that it is a Harper sales tax and there's no way that the Harper government can stand back from that and shun responsibility.

Akin: What about the fact that Ontario is expecting a subsidy? Should you form a government in the near future will you honour Flaherty's deal with Ontario?

McCallum: Well, we shall see. I think we'll await Mr. McGuinty's clarification. Thank you.

Then, shortly before 5 p.m. today, comes this statement, issued by Premier McGuinty's office:

“Earlier today during a media availability, I indicated that Michael Ignatieff was supportive of the HST in Ontario. This is based on my understanding derived from a number of conversations between my office and Mr. Ignatieff's office. In fact, there has been no formal agreement. However, the clear impression I had was that the Federal Liberal Party was supportive of the HST in Ontario. Implementing the HST remains the single most important action we can take, as a government, to help the Ontario economy. We have an agreement in place with the Federal government and we expect that, going forward, it would continue to be honored, by any future government.”

The Diefenbaker Trophy: Awarded for supremacy in 'Blue Shirts" golf

House of Commons Diefenbaker Trophy

Const. Lionel Gibson of the House of Commons Security Services shows off the Diefenbaker Trophy awarded to the top golfer at the annual tournament for members of the House of Commons Security Services staff. Former prime minister John Diefenbaker donated the trophy himself, the only such trophy believed to be so designated by a prime minister.

Gibson, here, is in his street clothes, last Thursday, the day before the Tournament. He's normally seen by Hill denizens in the familiar uniform of the Parliamentary security staff: A blue shirt, black pants, and caps.

But last Friday, the members of the security services donned golf shirts and headed out to Buckingham Golf Course for the annual tourney.

Harper's Tories to table 'report card' as early as Friday setting stage for confidence vote

Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government will table its third “report card” on the federal budget and the economy as early as Friday as the Tories try to weaken the resolve of the Opposition Liberals to take the country to the polls to this fall.

The release of the report card will be tied to government legislation to implement the popular home-renovation tax credit. Both the report card and the home-renovation tax credit legislation are triggers for a confidence vote. If Harper's minority government fails to win the support of at least one opposition party, the country will be headed to its 41st general election – the fourth vote in five years – this fall.

Still, the first opportunity for a confidence vote is at least two weeks away, on Sept. 28, and until then, each party will be negotiating its way through a volatile political situation.

The Liberals unveiled two new television ads Sunday, as MPs prepared to return to the House of Commons on Monday for the first time since June 19.

In the new English ad, Ignatieff notes that nearly half-a-million Canadians don't have jobs now who had them last fall. He promises to “do better” by restructuring the workforce. The French ad begins with Ignatieff reminding viewers that he has worked abroad and says that kind of global view is important for Canada to succeed.

The Conservatives, for their part, began airing an ad last week that tries to suggest Ignatieff still harbours designs to lead a coalition government with the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois, a charge Ignatieff rejected.

The political skirmishes come ahead of a busy week in the House of Commons … [Read the rest of the story]

Layton retreats from "stand up" challenge to Liberals

Jack Layton in BC

Does Jack Layton want an election?

Last spring, it certainly seemed that way. As his caucus voted against the minority government of Prime Minister Stephen Harper in one confidence vote after another, Mr. Layton and the NDP taunted Michael Ignatieff and the Liberals for propping up the Tories.

They even took out radio ads that challenged Mr. Ignatieff to “take a stand” and defeat the government.

But now, as MPs prepare to return to the House of Commons Monday and with the Liberal declaration that they will no longer support the Tories and will indeed push for an election at the first opportunity, Mr. Layton's springtime ardour to “stand up” to Mr. Harper has changed.

“I think some Canadians are going to be looking for a new direction,” Mr. Layton said in an interview with Canwest News Service and Global National. “There's two ways we can get it: either by Mr. Mr. Harper working with other parties to establish a new approach on some key issues — that's what we're offering — or by rattling the cages and trying to take us off into an election.”

Mr. Layton has been here before … [Read the rest]

I took the picture on the left during the 2006 campaign. I left the Vancouver debates that year for a week with Layton. While other leaders jetted off in their campaign planes, Layton took us on ferry ride from Vancouver to Nanaimo — and the late November weather was perfect. This snap was taken on deck of the ferry as we were leaving Horseshoe Bay.

Clement unveils logo for G8 Muskoka Summit

Muskoka 2010 G8 Summit logo

I got a sneak peek of this((left) earlier this summer and I think it's a pretty sharp design: It['s the Muskoka 2010 G8 summit logo, unveiled today by Industry Minister Tony Clement.

“This image shows a windswept pine tree firmly rooted atop a solid rock foundation. It embodies the spirit of the Muskoka region,” said Minister Clement.

The logo was inspired by Canada's Group of Seven painters, whose works captured so remarkably the natural beauty of Muskoka. Their art transformed the Muskoka pine tree into a Canadian icon that made the region known the world over

No artist or creator is credited with this but the keen eye will note that the pine tree has eight 'leaves'.

Though today's release is from the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, Clement gets to announce this because he represents the riding of Parry Sound-Muskoka, the riding that will host the event.

I visited Clement in his riding earlier this summer and he's pretty much been Santa Claus there all year. The federal government has a special $50 million infrastructure fund for G8 preparations. Clement won the riding in 2006 by less than 30 votes, if memory serves. He increased that margin to a few thousand in 2008. With his own personal $50 million infrastructure fund, my guess is Tony wins in a walk next time out …

Stephen Harper vows to teach opponents a lesson, "make sure their little coalition never happens"

Just up on our site now:

Prime Minister Stephen Harper is calling for a majority Conservative government to “teach” his political opponents and “their little coalition” a lesson, according to a video leaked to the Opposition Liberals.

Harper and other Conservatives have, by and large, been reluctant for the last four years to speak publicly about the possibility of a majority Conservative government for fear it might alienate “soft” supporters who would drift back to another party.

Indeed, when Canwest News Service asked Harper in mid-August how he intended to win a majority government, he would not answer the question, saying only that he did not want an election.

But in last week's 10-minute speech to a partisan Northern Ontario crowd, Harper spent several minutes arguing that the country needs a Conservative majority government and urged supporters to work toward that end.

Here's my 'rush' transcript of the back half of Harper's comments:

The thing I’m most proud of as a government – instead of constantly asking our Canadian Forces to do more with less, we have given them the equipment they need and the respect they deserve. I just ask you for a moment to imagine how different things would be if the Liberals were still in power. Imagine the bloated bureaucracy they would have created and not have delivered a single-child care space. Imagine how many left-wing ideologues they would be putting in the courts, federal institutions, agencies, the Senate – I should say, how many more they would be putting in. Imagine the damage Mr. Ignatieff’s carbon tax would be doing to our economy in the middle of a global recession. We have come forward with our Economic Action Plan. It’s one of the largest-scale stimulus measures in the world. We’re delivering it in a rapid way but our spending friends is temporary. The opposition has been clear: We should be spending a lot more and we should make that spending permanent. And they have said — and I know Mr. Ignatieff’s trying to change his tune … they have said repeatedly they would raise taxes to pay for their permanent spending and that is one biggest reasons this government needs to be re-elected so that when the recession is over we can keep taxes going down in this country.

That will be the choice. I hear rumours, these days, we may be going to an election. The next election will be a choice between higher spending and higher taxes or it will be a choice between a balanced budget and keeping taxes doing down. It will be a choice between cracking down on crime or returning to soft-on-crime policies. But most of all – it will be a choice between having a conservative government and not having a conservative government. And let me be clear about this: We need to win a majority in the next election campaign. I’m not just saying because we need a few more seats. We saw what happened last year. Do not be fooled for a moment. If we do not get a majority, the Liberals, the NDP and the Bloc Quebecois will combine and they will form a government. They will deny this till they’re blue in the face in an election campaign but I guarantee you if we do not win a majority, this country will have a Liberal government propped up by the socialists and the separatists. That government may not last very long but every day it’s in office it will do long-term real-damage to this country. This country cannot afford a government like that. If they force us to the polls, we have to teach them a lesson and get back there with a majority and make sure their little coalition never happens.