Argument over $3 billion fund highlights political strategies

For the last week or so, the House of Commons has featured politicians blustering at each other over a $3 billion fund the Conservatives say is crucial to their job-creating infrastructure spending but which some opposition critics say is a slush fund to boost Tory political fortunes.

The political posturing briefly revived the spectre of another general election caused by a paralyzed Parliament.

Yet once the cameras and microphones are turned off, politicians on all sides privately say they there will be no election this spring and they expect the partisan wrangling to sort itself out by the end of the month when the first possible confidence votes might be held over the Conservative government’s $3 billion fund.

Still, the political theatre is a good example of how each party is trying to walk a fine line of demonstrating that they are not playing partisan politics — several polls have suggested that Canadians want politicians to end political gamesmanship in favour of real work on the recession — while at the same time laying down markers to be used for political advantage later … [Read the rest of the story]  

Attention Mac Geeks: Need advice on OS upgrade

OK, I'm Scottish and I'm cheap.

Here's the situation:

In our household, I have a G4 Cube 450 Mhz running a very early version of Mac OS X and I have an iMac 2Ghz Intel Core Duo running OS 10.4.11. (I'm also running my employer's MacBook which has 10.5.6 on it). It's time to replace the Cube (much as I love it) and we will likly replace it with a Mac Mini. The Mini will come pre-installed with the latest Mac OS (10.5.6) and iLife '09 apps.

Buying a Mac mini will cost me about CDN$800. But for that, I get the Mini plus the latest OS and iLife apps.

If I just want the latest version of the OS – 10.5.6 and the latest iLife apps — I'll be forking out $300.

So I'm hoping that if I buy a Mac mini, I not only get new hardware, I'll get new software discs to refresh the old iMac.

Or will I? When you buy new Mac hardware, can you use the discs that come with that hardware to upgrade software on other Macs you own?

Technorati Tags:

John Baird and the recent opening of a job with the Ontario PC Party

As he was heading into the House of Commons this morning, I managed to catch Transport and Infrastructure Minister John Baird, who, before coming to Ottawa, was a minister in the Progressive Conservative governments of Mike Harris and Ernie Eves in Ontario.

l

With the resignation of Ontario PC Leader John Tory in the wake of his by-election loss Thursday night, Baird is among those who many think might jump into the race to become PC leader in Ontario.

So, the first thing I did when I saw him was to ask: “Minister, do you want to be Premier?”

To which Baird smiled and replied: “My friend Dalton is the premier!”

The McGuintys (Premier Dalton and his MP brother David) and Baird have a long and sometimes acid history of political sparring. All three represent Ottawa area ridings.

So I ask again: “Well, would you like to succeed Premier McGuinty?”

Minister Baird smiled again at me as we continued to walk down the hall towards the Commons. We got to the Commons. He smiled again and whisked inside without another word.

Now, on the way out of the Commons, a gaggle of reporters was waiting for him and he stopped to scrum. Here's what he had to say about the PC Party leadership:

Reporter: So there might be a job opening in Queen's Park. Are you interested?

Baird: Which job is opening?

Reporter:  John Tory's job.

Baird: I'm very happy here.

Reporter: How bad do you feel for Mr. Tory?

Baird: It's obviously a big disappointment. I mean John's a great guy. He's contributed a lot not just to the party but to the country and the province and it's obviously a disappointment.

Reporter: What does his loss say about the party's chances in the province?

Baird: I think there's got to be a significant amount of soul-searching as to what it's going to take to get the party back on track.

Reporter: Was it the party or was it John Tory?

Baird:  These things are never a single cause.

Reporter: There's a few [MPs] from Queen's Park that moved up here. Do you see any of your colleagues going down or any of the first-time MPs from Ontario taking a run?

Baird: No idea. No idea.

Reporter: And you have no interest in —

Baird: I'm very happy with the job I have now.

Reporter: Has anyone approached you to ask you whether you are interested in the job from the party.

Baird:  David Akin did earlier.

Reporter:   From the party? He's from the party?

Baird:  No.

A new Twitter hashtag: #ottawaspends

I'm firing up a new hashtag for you Twitter folks.

It's called #ottawaspends. I'm thinking this can be Twitter location for discussion of the federal government's economic stimulus plan. You're free to tweet whatever you want on this tag, of course, but my tweets here will be more keyed to information and data point delivery.

For example, I'm going to try tweet quick bullet points whenever I get a press release in which a federal politician anywhere in the country issues a press release outlining any kind of federal spending. Now, I've only got 140 characters so here's the syntax I plan to use:

#ottawaspends [DEPT] [MINISTER RESPONSIBLE] [POLITICIAN ANNOUNCING] [AMOUNT] [PROVINCE] [MUNICIPALITY] [DESCRIPTION]

So how will that work?

Well, this morning, for example, ACOA (the Atlantic Canada Opportunities Agency) issued a press release in which Senator Donald Oliver announced, on behalf of Infrastructure Minister John Baird, a federal investment in some Nova Scotia municipalities for wastewater and drinking water systems. The combined federal, provincial and municipal investment is about $6 million but the federal portion is about $2 million. So my tweet will be:

#ottawaspends ACOA BAIRD OLIVER $2m NS Kentville Wastewater and drinking water projects

More details on these spending announcements should be posted at the Government of Canada news release centre but some, like ACOA's, are only posted at their departmental Web site.

Now this may be new money, old money, yet-to-be approved money — I don't care. The point of this is that on this date and time a federal politician stood up somewhere and took credit for putting some cash in the system. You're going to see Prime Minister Harper do that later today in Berwick, NS.

If you're new to Twitter, you can play along by simply following me — I'm davidakin on Twitter . If you do that you'll get all my tweets. Or you can head here to just follow this hashtag.

You can also track #ottawaspends through your favourite RSS reader. Here's the link to the #ottawaspends feed.

Should bloggers get the same legal protection as journalists?

A U.S. court is being asked to force a blogger to give up the IP addresses of those who commented anonymously at his blog as well as anyone who even viewed some content that is at the heart of a defamation action.

In response, some are prepared to argue that bloggers ought to afforded the same protections for anonymous sources that protect mainstream journalists (in the U.S. at least.)

l

The case involves a Charlottesville, Va. blogger who is being sued over content at his blog. A Washington-based public interest group, The Public Citizen Litigation Group, has intervened in the case and issued a press release today about this, with this paragraph:

“One of our country’s founding values is that the person standing on the soapbox in the town square has the same freedom of speech they have at The New York Times or the Toledo Blade, for that matter,” [the PCLG] said. “Bloggers … may not be ‘traditional’ journalists but they play an integral part in the way people get their news today.”

One aspect of this case I find alarming, is the demand by the plaintiff for the IP addresses of anyone who even viewed the blog posting.

An IP or Internet Protocol address, for those not up on all their geeky goodness, is a unique number that identifies your computer on the Internet. It's how the Internet knows where to find you. Every device connected to the Internet is assigned an IP address while connected to the network. If you connect to the Internet from an Internet service provider (ISP), that ISP will tend to keep records or logs of what IP address was assigned to which customer at what time. That's how your activities on the Internet can be traced back to a physical location. There are ways to connect to the Internet without leaving what are essentially breadcrumbs for someone who really wants to find you but that's a topic for another day …

The bottom line for most users is that when you surf the Web or read a blog and you do nothing else, you probably don't expect, nor should you, that a judge somewhere might want to examine your name, address, and reasons for looking at that online content.

Here's a note from Paul Alan Levy of the PCLG:

Together with the ACLU of Virginia and the Thomas Jefferson Center for Freedom of Expression, we have intervened in the case mentioned a few days ago in which a plaintiff in a defamation case retaliated against a blogger who covered his defamation suit in less than flattering terms by sending a highly invasive subpoena that demands production of the blogger's communications with his sources, IP numbers of all who posted on his web site or even READ the web site. There have been only a handful of cases in which courts have addressed whether bloggers should be treated as journalists for the purpose of considering the reporters' privilege. We are also arguing that, in addition to protecting the commenters on the blog for the reasons usually argued — protecting their right of anonymous speech — posters on a journalists blog should be treated as “sources” whose disclosure violates the journalist's own rights…

Conservatives concede error in issuing attacks in DFO's name

We now have some new information on the DFO press releases from earlier this week.

Federal Conservatives say they made a mistake when they allowed press releases attacking the Liberals to be written and distributed using taxpayer dollars, a contravention of federal government communication guidelines. . .

Officials in Shea's office say such partisan attacks should not have come from the department and the Conservative party will be reimbursing the department for the ads cost of preparing and distributing the prss releases.

“We are correcting the situation with the statements that were mistakenly issued under (departmental) letterhead. This was an oversight on our part,” said Ann Matjicka, who, as communications director for Shea, is part of her political staff and not a departmental employee. [Read the rest of the story]

The All-Party Party – the 2009 version

In 1997, then rookie NDP MP Peter Stoffer was a bit surprised that Christmas parties on Parliament Hill were segregated affairs by party. The Liberals held theirs here, the Conservatives held their's there and so on. So Peter went out and bought a $1,000 worth of booze and chips, slipped notes under the doors of MPs and let everyone know there'd be an all–party party. Well, Stoffer's initiative paid off in spades.

Other MPs chipped in with party supplies and cash and now, Stoffer's All-Party Party has become one of the most popular events every year on the Hill and raises thousands for a good cause. This year, Stoffer says the All-Party Party should raise between $6,000 and $7,000 for The Leukemia Society.

The money mostly comes from sales of booze at the cash bar. A few hundred staffers, mostly young people who work for the politicians, attend and I'm embarrassed that I don't enough of them by name. Resolution for next year: Get to know more young, political staffers. Stoffer also hits up MPs for a $50 donation, whether they plan to attend or not. A little more than 200 MPs responded to Stoffer's call.

Here's some pics:

Bachand and Akin

A couple of Quebecers: That's your (Montreal-born) correspondent with Bloc Quebecois MP Claude Bachand, his party's defence critic.

Peter Stoffer

Nova Scotia NDP MP Peter Stoffer is master-of-ceremonies of his All-Party Party.

Iggy Libs

MIchael Ignatieff lets his staff out! From left, OLO staffers Christina Richard, Nina Haugh, Mike O'Shaughnessy, and J.F. Del Torchio.

200903042158.jpg

It's kinda hard to top a guy in red serge playing a banjo — unless you're a guy in red serge playing a drum.
200903042159.jpg

Are these guys ready to run the country? Of course, they are! From left, NDP press secretary Jesse Brady, MP Charlie Angus aide Jeremy Huws, and NDP Senior Press Secretary Karl Belanger.

Check out the rest of the photo album.

Attacking the Liberals — with your tax dollars – with UPDATE

Please see a new post with updated information on this story

Yesterday, a Liberal senator, Mac Harb, tried to table a private members' bill that would have effectively ended Canada's seal hunt.

A Conservative senator, Newfoundland's Fabian Manning, objected to this idea but rather than issue a press release from his own office or through the Conservative Party's press centre, Manning unleashed a partisan attack under the imprint of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Government departments need to communicate with Canadians from time to time on non-partisan issues and that's what the taxpayer-funded departmental communications staff is there to do. Departmental staff are not to be used to attack other federal politicians.

l

Manning, though, was just following the lead of the minister, Gail Shea, who, a few days earlier, had tried to use the cover of a news release titled “Government of Canada Defends the Right of Hard Working Canadian Sealers to Earn a Livelihood” to get in a shot at Harb in the last paragraph of that release: “It is my hope that Senator Mac Harb can appreciate the hardship his proposal will cause and stand with us in support of Canadian sealers.”

The press release from Shea would have been perfectly fine without that last paragraph as it set out some government policy and explained some steps the government was taking to defend that policy.

In any event, Harb's bill quickly died as it failed to get even one senator from his own party to second it. My colleague Janice Tibbetts wrote about this issue for today's papers.

Nonetheless, at 7:36 p.m., well after Harb's bill had died and well after Liberal MP Gerry Byrne had issued a press release denouncing Harb's ideas, Shea's office issued a press release denouncing a Liberal “hidden agenda”.

It contained this paragraph:

“While Liberals try and please special interest groups our Conservative government will seriously defend our sealers and we will continue to fight for the rights of hard-working Canadian sealers, on the international stage and here in Canada, so they may provide a livelihood for their families through our lawful, sustainable and humane hunt.”

Again, that's unusually partisan language for official departmental press releases paid for by all taxpayers.

Press releases with that kind of language are precisely the reason the Conservative Party of Canada employs Ryan Sparrow.

Calls are in to Treasury Board for the guidelines on this issue.

UPDATE:

While we're waiting to see if Treasury Board President Vic Toews or his designate has anything to say on this matter, my attention has been directed to the Treasury Board's Communications Policy of the Government of Canada.

Here is the section, from that policy, on values and ethics in official government communications, such as those released by Shea's department:

Values and Ethics

  • informing the public about policies, programs, services and initiatives in an accountable, non-partisan fashion consistent with the principles of Canadian parliamentary democracy and ministerial responsibility;
  • communicating in a manner that affirms Canadian values of freedom, openness, security, caring and respect;
  • ensuring that public trust and confidence in the impartiality and integrity of the Public Service of Canada are upheld;
  • honouring the value and reputation of the government and public institutions in all communication activities;
  • working collaboratively with institutions to serve the public interest;
  • providing useful, timely, accurate, clear, objective and complete information to the public in both official languages;
  • respecting privacy rights, security needs and matters before the courts;
  • avoiding conflicts of interest and the appearance or public perception of endorsing, or providing a marketing subsidy or an unfair competitive advantage to, any person, organization or entity outside of government.

Car companies lose their minds

Auto analyst Dennis Desrosiers is amazed (and not in a good way) at some of the dumb things the auto industry does. He sent around a note yesterday titled “The Automotive World Has Gone Mad” with examples of some of the strange decisions auto execs and policymakers have made and are making. Here's some excerpts (*See the bottom of the note for some explanations of acronyms and terms):

l

  • A Detroit – 3 CAW worker comes home early and finds a strange car in their driveway. Curious he checks out this out and finds his spouse in bed with a complete stranger. The worker goes back to work and GM / Ford / Chrysler files the divorce papers for the worker and pays the legal costs for the divorce… or at least part of the legal cost. Why are the D-3 paying for CAW workers' divorces
  • Scrappage programs are proven to be an effective way to get older vehicles off the road and to stimulate sales and improve the environment. Our Government launches a scrappage program which gives a consumer $300 dollars to get rid of an older vehicle that is worth $2,000 and they don't even get the $300 dollars instead they get a certificate to buy a bicycle. And our Government wonders why the market is not responding?
  • The pension funds of the D-3 are under-funded by billions of dollars and Governments may have to make up the difference. But CAW workers don't contribute to their pension funds. Why should Governments have to fund pension plans for workers who don't contribute to their own pensions.
  • Governments are forcing vehicle companies to build vehicles that consumers are unlikely to ever buy. Has anyone looked at hybrid sales this year now that gas prices are low again.
  • We have the near identical vehicles for sale in both Canada and the US. About 60 percent of Canadians bought a small fuel-efficient vehicle but only 28 percent of Americans. Yet politicians in the US claim the OEMs do not have a fuel-efficient product mix in the US. If this is true then how in the heck did Canadians find these products to buy?
  • Vehicles per driving age population in the US at 101 percent while in Canada it is only 74 percent. I believe the transportation needs in Canada are being filled quite adequately with this lower level of ownership … how is it that Americans need 101 percent ownership?
  • For most of the last two decades the dealers in Canada fighting tooth and nail to keep our chartered banks out of leasing and in a matter of months ( when their own OEM leasing companies cut back on funding of leases ) begin to lobby our Government to allow banks to begin leasing vehicles possibly creating thousands of potential competitors ( each and every bank branch in theory ) leasing new vehicles.
  • Ford in the US saying they are in better shape than GM because their sales were only down 49.5 percent and GM's were down by 53.1 percent. Chrysler Canada leading their press release with the fact they are the number one selling vehicle company in Canada and ignoring the fact that their sales were down 27.0 percent.
  • Labour featherbedding their contracts to the N’th degree and then standing up and declaring they aren’t part of the problem because their hourly wage is the same as Toyota who has zero featherbedding with their workforce.

CAW – Canadian Auto Workers, the union representing a lot employees at the D-3. Honda and Toyota manufacturing employees in Canada are not represented by the CAW.

Detroit-3 or D-3 refers to the three car companies who had their corporate roots in Detroit: General Motors, Ford, and Chrysler

OEM – Original Equipment Manufacturer