Advice for Obama: Pay attention to your currency first

James Grant has some economic advice for President Obama:

In the long run, nations consume and produce in roughly equal measure; they have no choice. The United States is the rare exception. It is privileged to consume much more than it produces (a difference measured by the current account deficit) and to have done so virtually year in and year out for the past quarter century. This wonderful feat is possible because the dollar is the preeminent monetary brand — the world's “reserve currency.” The United States' creditors willingly accept it. And, accepting it, they turn around and invest it back into the obligations of the United States. There can be few items higher on the to-do list of the incoming administration than to freshen and strengthen the dollar brand.

A strengthened American currency, of course, may be just the thing for those, like Canada, who depend heavily on selling lots of stuff to Americans every year. If the dollar rises and the loonie falls, that has the effect of making Canadian goods, services, and employees relatively cheaper.

Americans, as a result, might buy more stuff from Canadians and our trade surplus — which is getting dangerously close to becoming a trade deficit — would likely widen.

Now, as with any economic transaction it seems, there would be some downside. Because world oil prices are denominated in American dollars, a rising dollar would automatically push pump prices in Canada higher. You might have noticed this already. Even though oil was trading at something around $45 US a barrel (that's right $45!! a barrel), your local gas station was probably charging you something around 85 cents a litre (that's the national average: It's just 73 cents here west of Ottawa). That's better than last summer, of course, but your local pump price hasn't fallen as much as the price of a barrel of oil because the refiners and retailers who supply your local gas station need American dollars to buy their raw material: oil. And as the dollar rises against the loonie, they will need more loonies to buy the same amount of oil. And that's why pump prices aren't falling that fast.

And what about groceries? Food makes up a big chunk of the budget of most Canadian households, particularly those in middle- and lower-income brackets. A lot of the food we buy — oranges from Florida, broccoli from California — comes from the U.S. Again, a stronger American currency makes many groceries more expensive. Indeed, Statistics Canada said on Friday that while overall inflation is pretty tame (just 1.2 % year-over-year), food prices are definitely rising quickly:

Food prices increased 7.3% during the 12-month period, following a 7.4% increase in November. Excluding food, the CPI posted no change in the 12 months to December. This was the slowest pace registered for this index since November 2001.

The underlying factor for rising prices for food was sustained price increases for food purchased from stores. Prices for food purchased from stores rose 9.0% in December, identical to November's increase. The main contributor was a 26.9% increase in prices for fresh vegetable items, products which are largely imported.

Persistent price increases for bakery and cereal products (+12.4%) also contributed to rising prices for food purchased from stores.

In any event, Grant closes his short essay with this paragraph:

No small source of strength in the U.S. economy is Americans' capacity for failure. They excel at pratfalls. They file for bankruptcy and emerge without permanent social stigma. They recognize error and put it behind them. The next administration should thus turn a deaf ear to suggestions to manipulate energy prices, prop up housing prices, suppress short selling in the stock market, or otherwise try to prolong boom-time errors. Japan, refusing to let its own great bubble deflate, suffered a decade of economic stagnation. The United States, too, must take its bubble-related lumps, of which the current financial crisis is clearly one. But as the 44th president would be wise to remind his compatriots, the United States has no time for lost decades. Let markets clear and a new day dawn.

Technorati Tags: ,

What to do with Omar Khadr?

Stephen Harper and Omar Khadr were born in the same place — Toronto — 27 years apart.

Harper, partly by the happy accident of the kind of family he was born into, went on to become prime minister of his country. Khadr, partly by the unhappy accident of the kind of family he was born into, has been in captivity in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba for more than one-third of his life.

Many believe that both Harper and Khadr — and anyone else born in Canada for that matter — should always be able to count on the kind of justice system we have in this country. Indeed, Harper is availing himself of Canada's justice system. He has sued some Liberals for saying nasty things about him. Khadr, on the other hand, is accused of murder and war crimes allegedly committed when he was 15-years-old but Canada's justice system has never had a chance to adjudicate the merits of these charges. (Ironically, Khadr is suing Harper for the right to have his charges adjudicated here.)

Khadr, you'll remember, was arrested by U.S. troops when he was 15 on a battlefield in Afghanistan. Canada's government — the government Harper now leads — was the first country in the world to agree that 15-year-olds, no matter what they were doing on a battlefield and no matter whether they were part of a national army or not, are, by definition, victims of war crimes and not perpetrators of war crimes. This is the other great irony here: The first child – Khadr — to be charged with a war crime is a citizen of the first country in the world to sign the UN “Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict”, which, some legal beagles say, defines anyone under the age of 18 involve or recruited to particpiated in an armed conflict as a victim of a war crime.

This, I should note, is not a Conservative or Liberal thing. Neither prime ministers Harper, Chretien nor Martin ever asked Khadr's jailers and accusers — the Americans — if Canada could have him back so that Canada's justice system can examine the actions of one of their own citizens under the laws that govern all Canadian citizens.

The Khadr debate, it seems to me, is not a debate about the rightness or wrongness of an individual. The crimes he is accused of and may very well be guilty of are heinous and repugnant. To me, this is an issue about Canada's sovereignty. Is Canada willing to allow someone born in the same city as its prime minister to be tried and punished by a court in another country when Canada, through the United Nations and elsewhere, has signed international treaties claiming jurisdiction?

This is no longer an academic question of course. With President Barack Obama's decision to close the jail Khadr has spent one third of his life in, Harper and Canada must soon decide what to with Omar Khadr. The editorial writers at The Calgary Herald have something to say on this issue today.

Technorati Tags: , ,

The budget striptease continues

During a luncheon speech today in Sydney, N.S., Natural Resources Minister Lisa Raitt said the budget to be tabled Tuesday will contain $1.15 billion in spending on programs that could help the forestry sector and small towns in rural Canada that depend on that sector.

This pre-budget spending announcement comes the day after the PMO said the deficit would be $34 billion next year.

I'm sensing that the government's communications strategy is to push out quite a bit of the budget ahead of time to gain control of the news agenda.

Up next: HRDC MInister Diane Finley at 1:30 EDT today in Toronto; Agriculture Minister Gerry Ritz in Edmonton at 11 am (Mountain); and Health Minister Leona Aglukkaq at noon PST in Vancouver. Wonder what they might have to say …

North Cascadia? New Columbia? Vancouver Sun columnist says British Columbia is a bit tired

Vancouver Sun columnist Douglas Todd argues that it might be time to consider ditching the name British Columbia in favour of some a little more au courant:

I side with readers who are concerned that the “British” in British Columbia conveys the anachronistic impression we are an afterthought of a former European empire; like British Guiana or British East Africa, or French Polynesia or the Belgian Congo — before they all dropped their colonial prefixes.

I am well aware residents of the West Coast of Canada enjoy practical independence from Britain. I even have a soft spot for “our” Queen, Elizabeth. But I also appreciate the power of symbols.

Residents of this province have the courage and strength to build on our emerging identity to come up with a more fitting name. All societies are in flux. A decent discussion over our name could reflect our evolution.

Can we find a name that better fits the rugged Pacific Northwest of the continent? What can we call the Canadian arm of a distinct bio-region that includes Oregon and Washington State, which geographers have for decades been calling Cascadia?

What are we afraid of? …. [Read the rest of the column]

He's inviting those with ideas about this to chime in on his blog.

Obama's busy spring

Everyone wants President Obama to drop by and say hello. Canada, we've heard from Canadian sources, will be his first international source, likely some time in early March.

Obama's big international coming-out party will be the G20 meeting in London, England on April 2. This is the essentially the second half of the G20 meeting that Barack's predecessor hosted in Washington in November to deal with the economy. At the earlier meeting, world leaders agreed to get together in the spring to to do more to help the global economy.

From London, Obama (and Prime Minister Harper) will travel to the NATO heads of state meeting in Strasbourg, France on April 3-4. It is the 60th anniversary of the alliance and there are plenty of important issues for it to consider namely and in no apparent order: 1) A resurgent Russia, 2) Afghanistan and 3) NATO expansion.

Now we learn, from a blog covering Hilary's Secretary of State-ship, that after that, Obama will do a European tour after the NATO meeting that will include a stop in Russia.

Indian Prime Minister can't come to Canada

200901222122.jpg

I'm not sure if we knew this already — I didn't so I guess it was news to me — but a very tired-sounding International Trade Minister Stockwell Day said on a conference call today that Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh will not be able to visit Canada. (Day, in Mumbai where it was 10:30 pm was wrapping up a busy four day visit to India and he sounded like he was looking forward to getting back home.) Prime Minister Singh accepted Prime Minister Harper's invitation to visit Canada when the two met at the Commonwealth Summit in Kampala, Uganda last fall.

If memory serves, the news that Singh had accepted Harper's invitation was greeted with considerable excitement in Canada at the time.

Day did not elaborate on the reasons for Singh's change of heart and Day noted that Singh had, instead, invited Harper to visit India. If Harper accepts — and why wouldn't he? – my bet is that Harper squeezes in a day or two in India when he travels to Singapore next November for the annual leaders summit of APEC leaders.

This picture of Day meeting Singh was provided to me by the Government of Canada.

The PMO begins the budget striptease

For the record: The PMO responds to say that this post is “ridiculously inaccurate” and that Byrne is not involved in the budget roll-out. I'm waiting for a little further clarification. So take this with a grain of salt until further notice:

This morning's headlines were filled with reports from the Parliamentary Budget Officer and private sector forecaster Global Insight that Canada was about to go into deficit to the tune of $13 billion even before spending a penny on fiscal stimulus.

Over the next five years, these reports said, Canada would rack up more than $100 billion in deficits — nearly wiping out the $105 billion that's been paid down on our national debt over the last decade.

Seeing these kind of headlines was, I'm told, a bit unsettling for Jenni Byrne, one of Harper's most powerful advisors. She is in charge of “Issues Management” at the PMO. In other words, if there's an issue, it's her job to manage it to the benefit of her boss. Byrne hosts a daily conference call at the crack of dawn with communications aides from each cabinet ministers office and, though I I've never been on the call, I'm told she's not shy about letting people know when she thinks they've screwed up and let an issue get “unmanaged”.

Now no one in her government was responsible for the unsettling deficit projections in the day's papers but she decided to get ahead of the game with what, as BMO Capital Markets economist Doug Porter described it when we talked to him today, might be a great public relations move to get the bad news about the budget out of the way today. Rather than have post-budget headlines filled with “OTTAWA SPILLS GALLONS OF RED INK”, she could release the deficit numbers now, get that headline out of the way and then, next week, the post-budget headlines might read “OTTAWA SAVES ECONOMY WITH BILLIONS IN SPENDING”.

And so, Byrne dispatched the PMO's communications staff to convene a not-for-attribution briefing with Hill reporters — these happen relatively frequently for a variety of reasons — to make sure the deficit news was spinning her way.

Now, normally, the announcement of a key financial benchmark such as the size of the government's deficit is made by the finance minister speaking on the record after handing out substantial financial documentation to those in the room and publishing it online so that all Canadians can see what's going on.

But for this announcement, the revelation of the size of the deficit was made by communications staff from the Prime Minister's Office in a briefing for Parliament Hill reporters. Reporters — and only one reporter from each news organization is allowed in to these things — are allowed to participate on the condition that the PMO officials may not be quoted by name. There were no elected officials at the briefing.

Moreoever, no news organization was told ahead of time about the subject of the extraordinary off-the-record briefing. That's important because had news organizations known that it was going to be about the budget, presumably they'd have assigned their economics reporters. On other days, these briefings could be mostly about foreign affairs and then you'd want your foreign affairs specialist present. Normally, advisories are sent out a few days ahead of time to media organizations across the country and around the world when the governnment is about to unveil such an important financial benchmark.

Scott Brison, a former federal cabinet minister and the Liberal party's finance critic, said the fact that PMO officials unveiled this figure in this way is a demonstration that Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is not calling the shots on this budget.

“It's pretty clear that it's the PMO that's running the budget,” said Brison. “There's a real issue here that they're undermining [the] finance [department]. Who's the finance minister? Is it Jim Flaherty or Stephen Harper? Jim Flaherty's got the title. Harper should give him the job.”

Byrne, though, is betting that all this stuff about who releases what numbers when is too much “inside baseball” for most of Canada to care about. All she wants is a headline next Wednesday that doesn't mention deficits and only mentions spending. We'll see what happens next week.;

The White Moose

This is just cool and I wanted to share it. Relatives in Northwestern Ontario passed along these photos, taken by Ontario Provincial Police near Kirkland Lake, Ontario. You'll see a lot of moose if you spend time in northern Ontario but few have ever seen an albino moose:


200901220858.jpg


200901220859.jpg


200901220900.jpg

Obama "In the face of doubt, openness prevails"

On his first full day in office, President Barack Obama ordered this memo be circulated:

January 21, 2009

MEMORANDUM FOR THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENTS AND AGENCIES

SUBJECT: Freedom of Information Act

A democracy requires accountability, and accountability requires transparency. As Justice Louis Brandeis wrote, “sunlight is said to be the best of disinfectants.” In our democracy, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), which encourages accountability through transparency, is the most prominent expression of a profound national commitment to ensuring an open Government. At the heart of that commitment is the idea that accountability is in the interest of the Government and the citizenry alike.

The Freedom of Information Act should be administered with a clear presumption: In the face of doubt, openness prevails. The Government should not keep information confidential merely because public officials might be embarrassed by disclosure, because errors and failures might be revealed, or because of speculative or abstract fears. Nondisclosure should never be based on an effort to protect the personal interests of Government officials at the expense of those they are supposed to serve. In responding to requests under the FOIA, executive branch agencies (agencies) should act promptly and in a spirit of cooperation, recognizing that such agencies are servants of the public.

All agencies should adopt a presumption in favor of disclosure, in order to renew their commitment to the principles embodied in FOIA, and to usher in a new era of open Government. The presumption of disclosure should be applied to all decisions involving FOIA.

The presumption of disclosure also means that agencies should take affirmative steps to make information public. They should not wait for specific requests from the public. All agencies should use modern technology to inform citizens about what is known and done by their Government. Disclosure should be timely.

I direct the Attorney General to issue new guidelines governing the FOIA to the heads of executive departments and agencies, reaffirming the commitment to accountability and transparency, and to publish such guidelines in the Federal Register. In doing so, the Attorney General should review FOIA reports produced by the agencies under Executive Order 13392 of December 14, 2005. I also direct the Director of the Office of Management and Budget to update guidance to the agencies to increase and improve information dissemination to the public, including through the use of new technologies, and to publish such guidance in the Federal Register.

This memorandum does not create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is hereby authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

Canada's Information Commissioner heartily approves.

Technorati Tags:

U.S. establishes Afghanistan Support Office

In his last week in office, President George W. Bush ordered that a special “Afghanistan Support Office” be created within the Department of State. It will be headed by a Director, the first one of which will, it looks like, be selected by Secretary of State Hilary Clinton.

The purpose of the ASO shall be to perform the specific project of supporting executive departments and agencies in preventing Afghanistan from becoming a safe haven for terrorists, facilitating Afghanistan's progress to self-sufficiency, and maintaining an effective diplomatic presence in Afghanistan.

Don't know much about this and the search phrase <“Afghanistan Support Office” Bush> yields nothing in Google Web or Google News. Would love to know more about budget; reason for existence; etc.

Bush issued the order on Jan. 16 and it will be published in the U.S. Federal Register Thursday.

Technorati Tags: , , ,