Jeff, Paul, Chris — don't take this the wrong way cuz you guys are fabulous journalists with a long track record of outstanding work and, on top of that, you're all a bunch of swell guys and have been tremendously helpful any time I've asked for your advice or help.
But as ivory tower media critics/observers – oy! That new site of yours is awful! Your promise (I think) is that you'll take a critical look at what we're doing over here in the MSM so far as covering the election. Great. Good idea. That's an important role.
But I've got to tell you: The amateurs in the blogosphere do a better job of keeping us on our toes. They generally do it faster, and, so far, they do it better. Don't believe brother Wells. He's being too kind. As Ben Bradlee famously said, “Get some harder information next time.”
Some friendly advice:
• You have friends in newsrooms, I have friends in newsrooms. We all have friends in newsrooms. Don't be afraid of friends in newsrooms. Name names. Call a spade a spade. Crack a few eggs. If it's crap, it's crap. If it's great, it's great.
• News, gentleman, just doesn't happen in The Globe and Mail and on CBC television. How's the paper in Nanaimo covering this election? What about the Metroland giveaways? What's going on with private radio? (I think I can name precisely one non-CBC radio reporter here on the Hill.) The PMO knows that talk radio moves the dial on key issues. Do you?
• in 2006, being online was an option for most MSM outlets. It is now an imperative. How are the MSM dealing with that? Are more resources being applied to the online operation?
• I'm doing my site on my own dime and my own time, pretty much, but even I could afford a digital camera. Can Carleton spring for a little audio and video on your site? Ask your students: Do they like to read the news or watch it?
• Um, the site's promo says, “a daily publication produced by faculty and students in the School of Journalism and Communication.” Where be the students?
• A special note for Paul: It says right there in your bio that you're working for EKOS. Fair enough. But you only talk about them and no one else. It feels kinda odd that EKOS keeps comin' up …
Now, I'm probably being a bit of a dink here but that's because, like you guys, I care a great deal about the mainstream media in this new 'digiverse' and I think that, if you do what you set out to do, you could help things and raise some important questions. The survival and prosperty of a mainstream media fulfilling the role that it took upon itself in postwar Canada and the U.S. is, important, I think, for democracy. Journalists, as you guys know, of course, comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable. Bloggers and 'citizen journalists' just aren't built for that kind of mission. They don't have the money for it. They're important but they do 'advocacy journalism', a polite way of saying, they are writing/reporting to sustain their sociopolitical worldview. When the MSM is at its best, the only worldview it tries to sustain is that you ought to know what's going on. You ought to know tomorrow's weather, yesterday's sports scores, and what politicians are doing today with your money.
So, please, keep at it. Keep pokin' at the MSM beast. But please put just a little bit more oomph into it.
Cheers!
Technorati Tags: journalism