Deen Beeby is the Access to Information ace at The Canadian Press' Ottawa bureau (Bronskill over there is pretty sharp, too). He's got a great knack for asking for just the right kind of documents that often contain interesting nuggets about what your federal government is doing. This morning, he reported that something was so interesting in documents about to be released to him by the Department of Public Works and Government Services that a political aide to the then-minister of the deparment, Christian Paradis, had a bureaucrat literally run to the mailroom to intercept the documents that were about to be sent to Beeby. The bureaucrat's excuse: They were frantic to save CP $27.40 in photocopying charges. Yes. My eyebrow is raised as well at that one.
That revelation prompted the prime minister's chief spokesman to acknowledge that interference in the ATI process should not have happened.
That's not good enough for the federal Liberals who say this kind of situation is precisely why Parliament has an information commissioner:
Acting Information Commissioner Suzanne Legault should immediately launch an investigation into political interference by the Harper government under the Access to Information Act, Liberal MPs said today.
“This is a clear-cut case of the Harper government’s direction to deny or limit Access to Information requests that reveal their mismanagement,” said Liberal Treasury Board Critic Siobhan Coady. “Direction to not disclose information comes from the Prime Minister’s office. The Harper government has routinely pressured non-partisan ministry officials, from Deputy Ministers on down, to prevent disclosure of politically damaging information.
Tough call for Legault. She's the “acting” commissioner. If she were the regular commissioner, she'd have the closest thing you get in politicis to tenure, i.e. a seven-year appointment that only Parliament can interrupt and then, only if youve been a very, very naughty commissioner. I assume (and hope) Legault wants to have the 'interim' descriptive removed from her title. Does launching an investigation help or hurt her chances of the government putting forward her name to be confirmed as commissioner? (I hope it doesn't hurt her chances that, based on our one and only meeting, I think she's got a good grasp of the issues those of us in the requester community have.)